Talk:Susning.nu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Sweden (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

What do you mean, biased...?


Lets remove the logo picture. It serves little purpose, and is not GFDL. Any objections? Luke 21:34, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I'm one of the writers at susning. I think it is not a problem but I can ask the owner of susning if it is ok to use the logo here. // Solkoll 21:40, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
And I just did: Comment for version 323 of the page "susning.nu" at susning.nu

I'm user:LA2 a.k.a. Lars Aronsson, the founder and owner of susning.nu. It is correct that the logo is not GFDL. I noticed that the article on General Motors depicts the GM logo, which I assume is not GFDL either. I don't know if this is any problem or what Wikipedia's policy is concerning logotypes. I have no intentions to GFDL the susning.nu logo. I don't mind that it is depicted here, but I also agree that this serves no significant purpose. I would mind if the logo or name of susning.nu was abused as a trademark, but I see no such risk at present. --LA2 02:39, 2004 Sep 19 (UTC)

The use of the logo in Susning.nu definitely falls under fair use. I think it adds significant value to the article. — David Remahl 09:20, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Past tense[edit]

Let’s change this article to use the past tense; a Wiki which has been closed for editing for three years is no longer a wiki. --193.11.177.69 05:39, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, now rewritten and updated. --193.11.177.2 (talk) 01:46, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit]

There wasn't that much ads, was there? On almost all articles? Strange, I can't remember that. --90.129.14.62 (talk) 12:30, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

The sentence was changed from "some" to "practically all" in this edit. As that user has since retired, and the "practically all" claim is disputed, I've changed it to "some". HeyMid (contribs) 13:30, 5 June 2011 (UTC)