Talk:Swarm robotics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Robotics (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon Swarm robotics is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page (Talk), where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
Note icon
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

I think[edit]

I think this article really could use some editorial work. It reads itself more like a science research conclusion, than a introduction article. It could also be more neutral, but collecting information about this topic is maybe not bad at the current state. It did some work on the overall text quality and also will look for this in the future. EggshellRobotics (talk) 20:32, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Attention needed[edit]

  • References - article is completely unrefrenced
  • Fix redlinks and introduce other links
  • Expand
Chaosdruid (talk) 23:45, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Traffic cone robotics system[edit]

It isn't well described how exactly the swarming works; ie is there a "leader robot" giving instructions or do all robots have situational awareness ? In any case, it would be useful to mention Shane Farritor's traffic cone robots; see http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn4932-robotic-traffic-cones-swarm-onto-highways.html

for an other swarm-system see http://www.ias.uwe.ac.uk/~a-winfie/Bjerknes_etal_TAROS07.pdf

91.182.155.116 (talk) 07:32, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Erasing the section "from centralized intelligence to swarm intelligence"[edit]

First of all, it contains nonsense.
Second it speaks about future and hypothetical technology. There is a policy about this : Wikipedia:NOR
Third, this really feels like a shameful trick to advertise a book.
I therefore take this section out.85.27.49.119 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:09, 13 November 2010 (UTC).