Talk:Taejo of Joseon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Biography / Royalty and Nobility (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (marked as Mid-importance).
 
WikiProject Korea (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
 
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Korean history working group.


Untitled[edit]

I moved this article back to King Taejo of Joseon, to keep in line with the naming of other articles about Korean monarchs. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Korean). (I had to manually move the article by cutting and pasting, since I couldn't use the "Move this page" feature) --Sewing 22:49, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Foreign relations[edit]

FIRST unexplained revert[edit]

The following revert needs further discussion:

  • diff 12:06, 29 August 2009 Historiographer (13,911 bytes) (diplomatic envoys were dispatched to China at first. However, It is not written, therefore, relationship with Japan is also unnecessary.)
  • diff 16:09, 30 August 2009 Tenmei (14,754 bytes) (Undid revision 310703098 by Historiographer ... removed sole inline citation and bibliogrphic reference; see talk)

For years, this article has had a {{Unreferenced|date=August 2007}}-headnote; nevertheless, in an article with no inline citations and no bibliographic reference source citations, Historiographer deleted both. The rationale for this edit is not transparent; and therefore, it needs to be explained.

I do not immediately recognize any relationship between the edit summary and the actions which this edit accomplished. In the context suggested by Historiographer's edit summary, the following may be relevant steps in a constructive direction:

This small misunderstanding doesn't need to become a bigger problem. --Tenmei

SECOND unexplained revert[edit]

Historiographer -- This revert needs amplification:

  • diff 14:18, 31 August 2009 Historiographer (14,885 bytes) (→Reign: superfluous words.)
  • diff 17:10, 31 August 2009 Tenmei (15,340 bytes) (Undid revision 311083766 by Historiographer ... See talk page)

Two unexplained deletions of the same text is difficult to understand, don't you think? As you know, this is my second revert; and in both instances, my "undo" was accompanied by an edit summary which pointed to further comments in this talk page context. Does this need to become a bigger issue? --Tenmei (talk) 17:26, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Comment
The following seems relevant in this context. --Tenmei (talk) 17:53, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
This was copied from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea#Taejo of Joseon and Joseon Tongsinsa
Hi, can you please come to discuss disputes on the talk page of Taejo of Joseon, and Joseon Tongsinsa? I deleted some unnecessary information in Taejo of Joseon about relationships with Japan added by User:Tenmei. But the user readded it and placed He did the same to Joseon Tongsinsa. He deleted arbitrary about diplomatic mission (Tongsinsa) of Joseon Dynasty before Japanese invasions of Korea, and changed their name as old romanization. Those are history articles that need more opinion from editors who know Korean history. Please join the discussions. Thank you.--Historiographer (talk) 14:51, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
This page is not "a lot of talks on Talk that I can not understand." Without any evidence of trying to understand, this page only shows a one-sided effort. --Tenmei (talk) 15:14, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

THIRD unexplained revert[edit]

This third unexplained revert is not unexpected; but more is required. The rationale which informs it is not obvious, not easy-to-understand.

  • diff 14:37, 17 September 2009 Historiographer (14,510 bytes) (Undid revision 311083766 by Tenmei ... See talk page)

This revert does not illustrate collaboration. --Tenmei (talk) 15:14, 17 September 2009 (UTC)