Talk:TeamXbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Video games (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Xbox task force.
 

POV[edit]

Most of this is POV nonsense: is there any reason why this shouldn't be listed for deletion? -- Francs2000 16:23, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

It's all relative man... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tieno007 (talkcontribs) 16:20, May 21, 2006
Oh look here , free advertisement for Teamxbox! Just because they're bought by IGN doesn't make them special. They are the epitome of unprofessionalism. Their message forum is garbage. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nsngwii (talkcontribs) 22:16, August 6, 2006
Link?

Are there any sources for those remarks?

Notability[edit]

This article needs sources to verify its claims of notability. --Elonka 22:51, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

It's page 1 google ranked for an Xbox search, it's been on xbox.com's affilates list since the original launch, and it has a high Alexia's rating, and is among one of the largest forums on the internet according to bigboards. 74.33.13.26 04:41, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

http://www.big-boards.com/board/116/

Furthermore, one might equally contend that it is not the responsibility of a lone wikipedia vigilante to overrule other, long accepted practices at Wikipedia which include the listing of IGN's other network sites which are similar in size and reach to TeamXbox. The list is at the bottom of the wikipedia article. This organizational structure, if successfully challenged, would have to fairly result in the 'movement' and not 'deletion' of all of these sites under the larger IGN network section, which would make access to the information prohibitively difficult as IGN network membership is not a primary or obvious characteristic for those that might seek information on any of these sites. IGN network membership is an established de facto verification of the site's claim to notability. As such, this article 'needs' nothing.

OTL[edit]

FTMFW!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.62.101.60 (talk) 14:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)