I do belive that "Faz" refers to face of an object, and is rarly, if not never, used to refer to someone's face. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk • contribs) 16:40, 16 September 2008
This article has a whole section talking about what "face" is in other languages, but it doesn't say anything about his actual character. Who he is, what his role in the team is, his history, etc. Compared to other members of the A-Team, this page is grossly unrepresentative. -220.127.116.11 (talk) 17:19, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
Oddly enough, there is information about Face's father on Murdock'spage, but not Face's. *facepalm* --Boycool42 (talk) 20:36, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 23:31, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Searching for "A-Team Face" or "A-Team Faceman" without real name is time-consuming more than "templeton peck". As for the show, a bunch of episodes are not enough to determine a commonly-used name. Non-primary sources use Templeton Peck, as well as "Templeton Face Peck" and "Templeton Faceman Peck", which are too competitive. George Ho (talk) 09:54, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
I take your point about Face/Faceman being potentially divisive. But there aren't really any decent sources in the article so all I have to go on is the TV show itself. I still think Templeton "Faceman" Peck is appropriate, to maintain consistency with John "Hannibal" Smith, et al. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 16:32, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Are these decent enough: ? As for consistency, commonly-used names based on natural disambiguation and reliable sources are used instead of parenthetical disambiguation. "B.A. Baracus" doesn't have to be exactly consistent, unless you want it "Bosco Albert 'B.A.' Baracus", which is not widely used. In this case, consistency isn't exact. --George Ho (talk) 19:29, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.