Talk:Tetraquark

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Physics (Rated Stub-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Comments[edit]

This page has been redirected to exotic meson because there is a more detailed description there. The candidate states earlier described here do not appear in the 2004 Reviews of Particle Properties, and are therefore unconfirmed. The material here has consequently not been merged into the page on exotic mesons. Bambaiah 07:09, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)

"dimeson"?[edit]

I notice that dibaryon is about a hexaquark particle of the same kind of configuration as a baryon doubled... and not about a two-baryon composite particle. dimeson would seem to be the equivalent term form this 4-quark particle of the same kind of configuration as a meson doubled... but "dimeson" seems to be about composite particles composed of two mesons? Seems like inconsistent terminology? -- 65.94.77.36 (talk) 23:23, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

diquark-antidiquark[edit]

According to X(3872) article, one tetraquark configuration is the diquark-antidiquark configuration, but statements about Z(4430) seem to say it is a doubled-up meson? -- 65.94.77.36 (talk) 00:36, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Rename the article to bimeson please. Hcobb (talk) 02:31, 15 April 2014 (UTC)