This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NPOV:Alabama Cooperative Extension System, written almost entirely by a news and public affairs employee at ACES, so needs some neutral eyes to give it a going-over to check for both neutrality, and layout/content inclusion, etc.
I propose that the article Mark Langford be merged into this article, because most of the details on the Mark Langford page replicate the details that are/should be here. Secondly, Langford only pass WP:notability thanks to his involvement with Accident Group. Rgds, - Trident13 18:10, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
This article is misleading in serveral respects mainly that the accident group was nothing like a law firm but was an unregulated claims management company which at one point had 25% of the personal injury market and would refer cases to panel solicitors for a investigation fee which was held by the court to be a referral fee in 2003 which is one of the reasons for the failure of the company. In addition Mark Langford never sent the text message that was sent on instruction from the administrators. I worked for the accident for 3 years and am a solicitor in this area and parts of this article are incorrect in my view. this unsigned comments was added by 22.214.171.124
I agree--being chairman of a business isn't noteworthy, but being chairman of a business that famously/scandalously let 2500 people go via text--that's noteworthy! The first thing I did when I read about it was to head to Wikipedia to see if we had any more info on him. Don't delete, expand. PoetrixViridis 17:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
I've removed the speedy deletion tags as it's clear to me this article does not meet WP:CSD - there is definitely a claim to notability as he was at the centre of a business scandal that had widely been reported on long before his death by multiple non-trivial published works such as newspapers and magazines (e.g. , ). The article may warrant merging into The Accident Group but that's a separate discussion. Qwghlm 17:22, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
yep, i'd have been tempted to call whoever added this speedy deletion tag a deliberate vandal if it wasn't so clear they were just way out of their depth. W guice 09:28, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
I'm afraid I had to remove the text "TOSSER OF THE HIGHEST ORDER" from the foot of the article, although I personally fully agree with the sentiment.. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 12:01, 9 May 2007 (UTC).