This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Please note inaccuracy within the first few words of the article. The American Interest can not be both non-partisan and a conservative magazine at the same time. Article is classified under the conservatism project, and it's own references identify it as a conservative publication. These references nullify claims of non-partisanship. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 15:10, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
I agree. While I find the magazine's articles interesting - they are not non-partisan. The author bios tend to dovetail to classic conservative think tanks and party positions when back-traced. None of which is acknowledged on their website that doesn't even have an about page. 184.108.40.206 (talk) 07:53, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Addendum - The "Statement of Purpose" section refers to a primary reference that no longer exists. So I'm removing both the section and the reference as unverifiable; and on the weight remaining evidence switching the magazine description from non-partisan to some flavour of classical conservatism. 220.127.116.11 (talk) 23:25, 29 June 2013 (UTC)