Talk:The American Interest

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Magazines (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.
WikiProject Conservatism (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Please note inaccuracy within the first few words of the article. The American Interest can not be both non-partisan and a conservative magazine at the same time. Article is classified under the conservatism project, and it's own references identify it as a conservative publication. These references nullify claims of non-partisanship. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.222.198.169 (talk) 15:10, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

I agree. While I find the magazine's articles interesting - they are not non-partisan. The author bios tend to dovetail to classic conservative think tanks and party positions when back-traced. None of which is acknowledged on their website that doesn't even have an about page. 110.32.19.166 (talk) 07:53, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Addendum - The "Statement of Purpose" section refers to a primary reference that no longer exists. So I'm removing both the section and the reference as unverifiable; and on the weight remaining evidence switching the magazine description from non-partisan to some flavour of classical conservatism. 58.111.83.23 (talk) 23:25, 29 June 2013 (UTC)