Talk:The Carpet from Bagdad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Featured article The Carpet from Bagdad is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
November 23, 2013 Good article nominee Listed
December 31, 2013 Featured article candidate Promoted
Did You Know
Current status: Featured article
WikiProject Film (Rated FA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
Featured article FA  This article has been rated as FA-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Silent films task force.
 

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Carpet from Bagdad/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 17:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

I'll be glad to take this one; thanks in advance for your work on it. -- Khazar2 (talk) 17:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

This looks good on a first pass. There's understandably little content, this being a mostly lost film, and a bit of Googling of my own didn't turn up any useful new sources. Let me go through the checklist, but this may already be ready to pass. -- Khazar2 (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Checklist[edit]

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear and concise, it respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct. Spotchecks show no evidence of copyright issues.
1b. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. The lead could perhaps use another sentence about the production information, but it at least touches on this section by mentioning the book as source.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
2b. all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines.
2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by images:
6a. images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment. Pass--very nice work