Talk:The Luck of the Fryrish

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Animation: American / Television Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group.
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group.

United States: Television

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force.

Futurama Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Futurama, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Futurama articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FuturamaWikipedia:WikiProject FuturamaTemplate:WikiProject FuturamaFuturama articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Futurama tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Futurama tasks:

Ongoing

Bring Futurama up to FA status.
Better define article assessment levels and reassess to include C class.

Needs attention

All images linked in any Futurama article need to have a fair use rationale, this includes:
- ~~episode articles~~ done
- Character and list of character pages
- All miscellaneous pages (as linked in the Futurama template)
All episode pages need to meet the standards of WP:NTVEP. A basic layout for how this can be accomplished is under discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Futurama/Archive 2#Episode article organization-revisited. Examples to follow include "Space Pilot 3000" and "Hell Is Other Robots".

Expand

Futurama Comics and its issues.
Articles related to Producers, Directors and Writers

Other ways to help:
Monitor changes to the project, changes to articles and changes to this to-do list.

The Godfather[edit]

The alternating storylines concept was apparently inspired by The Godfather movies.

I removed this as it seems to be purely speculative. If this is something from episode commentary it should be stated as such "apparent" sounds like someones guess and we need to really work on WP:OR and WP:V here. Stardust8212 03:48, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They do say that in the commentary. Specifically, they say the concept of two storylines in different time periods was inspired by The Godfather Part II. I'm readding it. ~ Switch (✉✍☺) 07:06, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reference from DVD commentary added. Cy3 (talk) 18:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

those aren't kangols[edit]

it notes that Fry is wearing Kangols in a flashback in this episode, however those are more than likely Roos. While both companies shared 80s popularity and a kangaroo logo, Roos had a small side pocket, which Fry uses to put his clover in. WikiTiki 07:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Title of the episode[edit]

Is the episode called "The Luck of the Fryish" or "The Luck of the Fryrish"? I've noticed both used throughout the article and was wondering which is the correct title? —King Ivan^{PWN3D! at the disco} 05:09, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fryrish. Fryish doesn't really rhyme with Irish. -- DocNox 02:21, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I always used Fryish but I forced myself to change. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! Us e r:Sp3000 02:23, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clearing that up! —King Ivan^{PWN3D! at the disco} 03:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bringing this up, tvguide.com and tv.com says its Fryrish, but i just saw this episode on adult swim and the info said Fryish.... interesting... this is just another one of thouse delemas like weather to count the two-part Star Trek: The Original Series Episode The Menagrie as one part or two.... heh EvilHom3r 03:50, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mmmm... i think we should add somthing like

any objections? EvilHom3r 04:03, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Volume 3 DVD boxset, which is an official Futurama product, the title is "The Luck of the Fryrish". I think "The Luck of the Fryish" only should redirect here. --Will Mak 050389 04:14, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

mmmm... yeah agreed. EvilHom3r 01:01, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Episode 4 or 6[edit]

On Netflix the episode is listed as being the 6th of the third season, while on this page it is said to be the fourth. Can anybody confirm whether or not the page is wrong and it is the 6th or Netflix is wrong and the page is 4th? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.203.60.56 (talk) 23:40, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://backupurl.com/cache/z8aht5.html
Triggered by \bbackupurl\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 17:42, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Luck of the Fryrish. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070701044703/http://www.annieawards.com/29thannieawardwinners.htm to http://www.annieawards.com/29thannieawardwinners.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:19, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect Quantum Mechanics Reference[edit]

The article claims Heisenberg uncertainty principle is referenced in the show, but I don't remember any references to it. In layman's terms, it states that you can't make certain quantum measurements together with high accuracy in both. It's far more likely the cited source was referring to the observer effect, which suggests the state of a quantum system can change when it's measured. (In the episode, a character says "No fair! You changed the outcome by measuring it!") These are loosely related but very different ideas. I think the Wikipedia article's source, Locus Online, just didn't research their claim or know the difference.

Bleh12479 (talk) 20:56, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would make this change, but I don't have any secondary sources to back my claim up. At the very least, I think the inaccurate portion which is already on the page should be removed.

Bleh12479 (talk) 20:56, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The "problem" is that the reference provided specifically references the Heisenberg principle. We could remove that line from the article altogether, but we can't change it to say observer effect without a source that makes that connection. I did a little checking and there are references to it, but I couldn't establish to my satisfaction that any of those were reliable sources. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 16:07, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As the article linked is in direct conflict with Wikipedia's own entry and the sources within it on Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, and also falls into line nearly verbatim with the first two sentences of - again - Wikipedia's own entry on The Observer Effect and all of the references within it, at the very least the sentence should be removed, as it is outright false regardless of who made the claim, and to a very obvious and serious degree (like claiming the American Flag contains no red stripes).

One step further - and separate from the request to remove - I vote to change the sentence to reference The Uncertainty Principle and simply use the quote from the episode with a link to Wikipedia's article on The Uncertainty Principle, as the "connection" between the definition of the thing and the reference is so straight-forward it is built into both the name itself and into the whole purpose of providing internal links to other Wikipedia entries in the first place. For example, if a source deliberately spelled "Bender" as "Bonder", we would never use the article's obviously incorrect spelling of "Bender" and completely change Bender's entire Wikipedia entry as a result to "Bonder". Imagine if the article called the quote in question a reference to "Circadian rhythm" or "the average height of males in Zimbabwe"; it would be beyond preposterous to use that article's obviously incorrect description, and the mere fact that it is that obvious should allow for the sentence without an external link. To go one step further: In the Futurama episode where Zoidberg eats an American Flag, there would be no reason to provide an external link to the fact that it is an American Flag because the fact that it is an American Flag is so obvious that linking the text "American Flag" to the Wikipedia entry on the same should be sufficient. 24.151.103.37 (talk) 06:51, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]