Talk:The Mind of the Maker

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Kevinalewis made a great start here, and several people have cleaned up the grammar, but this article still needs more work. I'm not sure one reference justifies "often quoted", for example, and I'm not sure why "The" has vanished from the title. Radagast3 (talk)

To restore "The" to the title, I've moved this page, and checked the links from the Dorothy L. Sayers article are OK. Radagast3 (talk) 03:49, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mind of the Maker edits

I am a former academic that came here to see if the Latin dedication appearing in that work has ever been translated in a publication (to check our own translation of it). I did some edits — both URLs were dead when I arrived, and there were various other technical problems. I do not like leaving articles heavily tagged, but I think the remaining edits need to be made by a registered editor, and there is significant work remaining to be done (WP:OR issue, mislabeled section isue, etc.). For a start, if you can find page numbers and other relevant bibliographic information for the two book references, and change the name for the section to something accurate to the content appearing (literary criticism and significance having specific meanings not captured by that section), then the section tag and even the article tag might be removed. However, apart from the one cited review, the article is poorly sourced, and even that review is poorly used, the earlier article editors relying on their own book interpretations and Sayers descriptions, rather than drawing from the review or other sources to create such content. Leaving this to you, as a regular dedicated editor there. 2601:246:C700:C:E1DD:E6DD:7781:735 (talk) 15:28, 4 July 2022 (UTC) I have posted the above to my talk page GrahamHardy (talk) 15:59, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]