This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
Any uninvolved administrator may, at his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working on a page within the topic of Austrian economics, if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standard of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
Instead of nominating (for second go-around) to delete, I suggest the essential first paragraph be implaced in Hoppe's article. The chapter info following isn't that interesting or encyclopedic. There are two ways to accomplish this. 1. If no one objects, we do a WP:BLAR. 2. If there are objections, we post a "Merge to/from" on the articles. – S. Rich (talk) 05:51, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
I have no objection to this. But it's substantively the same as deleting the article. So, I don't know why you object to such a vote. Steeletrap (talk) 20:14, 6 March 2014 (UTC)