Talk:The Myth of National Defense

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Philosophy (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Libertarianism (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon The Myth of National Defense is within the scope of WikiProject Libertarianism, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Libertarianism and related subjects in the Wikipedia.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

NPOV[edit]

This article reads like a plug for the book, rather than an encyclopedic article. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 20:48, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Another reference[edit]

Another ref: http://www.sovereignwarriors.com/the-myth-of-national-defense/ Mathmo Talk 03:53, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Merge to Hoppe article, rather than delete.[edit]

Instead of nominating (for second go-around) to delete, I suggest the essential first paragraph be implaced in Hoppe's article. The chapter info following isn't that interesting or encyclopedic. There are two ways to accomplish this. 1. If no one objects, we do a WP:BLAR. 2. If there are objections, we post a "Merge to/from" on the articles. – S. Rich (talk) 05:51, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

I have no objection to this. But it's substantively the same as deleting the article. So, I don't know why you object to such a vote. Steeletrap (talk) 20:14, 6 March 2014 (UTC)