Talk:The Power of the Daleks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Doctor Who (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Television / Episode coverage (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of television on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the episode coverage task force.
 
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Stub?[edit]

Is this article really a stub? It has 2 nav boxes, reasonably complete plot and synopsis sections, a picture and external links. Wendell 03:34, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

No, you're right. It's probably one of those lost in the shuffle when expanded but somehow managed to avoid having the stub tag removed. --khaosworks (talkcontribs) 04:07, August 14, 2005 (UTC)

Episode 1 and 2 Rumoured existance in uk?[edit]

Aswell as the information about The Massacre of St Bartholomew's Eve, i put the Power of the daleks possible existance information in aswell. here's a link to where i found this information. http://www.geocities.com/TelevisionCity/Lot/8256/landf.htm#sec.5 It also has information about other episodes that are rumoured to exist Like The Tenth Planet and The Ice Warriors episode 3. Finalwars 20:57, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

This is not any more substantial than rumours of the secret cabal that meets to watch lost Doctor Who episodes, not to mention that the article hasn't been updated since 2004, it seems, and that the rumour here is debunked. There is no mention of The Massacre. --22:31, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Regeneration?[edit]

The article states:

The concept of regeneration is not named in this serial. It was attributed after the fact by fans of the series and subsequently by the production team of The Five Doctors.

But surely regeneration is mentioned by name much earlier? In Castrovalva, for one? David 15:08, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

There's an awful of "facts set in stone" about the series that don't actually get established until quite late on, usually long after fandom has taken them for granted. The word "Regeneration" is not used at this time - instead it's called "renewal" - and for a time there were fans who speculated that the Hartnell-Troughton change was different. I think an early 1980s DWM still suggested this.
Hard confirmation that a regeneration took place doesn't come for nearly twenty years - The War Games just mentiones "Your appearance has changed before..." and The Three Doctors equally doesn't commit itself explicitly. The Brain of Morbius does suggest that Troughton and Hartnell were separate regenerations, but that's hardly the best story to anchor any discussion on the Doctor's lives. Later stories may use the term "Regeneration" but it's not until Mawdryn Undead that the Davison Doctor explicitly states that he has regenerated four times and has eight remaining. In The Five Doctors an exchange between the Hurndall and Davison Doctors establishes that Davison is the product of the "fourth" regeneration, Hurndall is "the original" (well standing in for Hartnell) and other dialogue further explicitly establishes the numbering for Troughton and Pertwee. Timrollpickering 20:56, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Powerofthedaleks.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Powerofthedaleks.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Powerofthedaleks1.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Powerofthedaleks1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:24, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Regarding Missing Serials Wiki Pages[edit]

Recently on a forum for Missing Episodes it was pointed out that should an individual with little knowledge of Doctor Who discover a canister in their attic, they may attempt to Google the title of the episode. Googling the phrase "Power of the Daleks" will result in the Wikipedia page for that article to appear at the top of the list.

The problem lies in that if the individual opens up that page and starts reading, they will not realize their film is missing until half way down the page.

I have made the change to the opening sentence in an attempt to convey this and try it out. If the structure does not work, please let me know. I would like to work with Wikipedia to see what the best solution is.

I have also posed this question in the talk page of the Missing Episodes wikipage.

SargeAbernathy (talk) 17:51, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

To avoid a split discussion, please comment at Talk:Doctor Who missing episodes#Regarding Missing Serials Wiki Pages. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:36, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

"The Doctor"[edit]

It is unfortunate that someone has written, over and over again in this article, "The Doctor" with a capital T. The Pope is the Pope, not The Pope. The Queen of England is the Queen of England, not The Queen of England. I have cleaned this, and some instances of "iffy" grammar, synthesis, etc. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 07:44, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Continuity[edit]

Is it really necessary to refer to the theoretical planet Vulcan here (not referred to elsewhere in the show, therefore not part of its continuity)--much less the Vulcan of Star Trek? If you want to write about Vulcan and Vulcan in fiction, please write about it on its page if it exists or else create that page. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 07:44, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

I have kept the reference to the Dalek Book but added a "citation needed" tag--I don't know how to make it superscript, unfortunately. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 08:09, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Use the template citation needed: {{citation needed}}. DonQuixote (talk) 12:55, 1 June 2013 (UTC)