|WikiProject Canada / Toronto||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
|WikiProject Film||(Rated Start-class)|
I was just over reading the article about this film at All Movie Guide. It's easy to see why they're respected. In comparison this POS article is boring and sophomoric. It's more and more obvious why Wikipedia is regarded as a joke: it's because the morons writing for it are.
- Such an adult response to the article. If you found it flawed, a REAL adult would edit it and improve the article, rather than call people names.Wzrd1 (talk) 03:36, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Shouldn't the article title be "The Recruit (film)" ?
220.127.116.11 02:22, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
I'm not completely gutting the trivia but I am removing unsourced statements like that the photo is actually of Collin Farrel & his father. If someone really thinks such statements are important, maybe they can find an established source (i.e. not googled random pages) for it. Epthorn 12:58, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Also deleted a few statements about what type of hardware was seen in the film (i.e. IBM keyboards, etc). No relevance that I can imagine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Epthorn (talk • contribs) 13:01, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Recruitmovie.jpg
Image:Recruitmovie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Reception in "Critical response" section only
In the beginning of the article we have the ratings from Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic. Yet we have the same thing in the section "Critical response". The first should be removed omho. Rbaleksandar (talk) 05:58, 30 July 2012 (UTC)