Talk:The Rolling Stones Rock and Roll Circus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Film (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
 Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
 
WikiProject Rock music (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

[edit] Thing, or thing of thing

"The Rolling Stones Rock and Roll Circus is a film released in 1996 of a 11 December 1968 event put together by The Rolling Stones - is this article about the film, or the event itself? Did the event have a name? It's a little point, but it might be useful for clearing up categories etc. -Ashley Pomeroy 18:09, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Do Not Merge the Dirty Mac

It's just my opinion, but the unlikely convergence of 4 of history's greatest rockers on one stage as a single supergroup seems to merit its own page. If they hadn't given their group a name, it could go either way, but since they did name it, I believe it should stay.Originalname37 (talk) 18:09, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

The mere formation of the Dirty Mac, and its brief existence for this one performance, is noteworthy on its own because of the quality of the performers, and the historical value of the information. It definitely deserves an entry of its own. 96.56.0.38 (talk) 18:41, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

well said. Kingturtle (talk) 13:26, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export