Talk:The Skeptic (UK magazine)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Magazines (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.
WikiProject Skepticism (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject United Kingdom (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

Article format/contents[edit]

I think 7 screens listing all the past issues is a bit much. Richard001 (talk) 06:42, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Agreed.[edit]

"Previous Volumes" is a word-for-word copy of information available at the website, and an unnecessary list at a website where such lists are frowned upon. This from a fan of The Skeptic. Cluebot automatically reverts, if anyone wants to go ahead and fix this. 67.164.44.216 (talk) 23:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Editorial Advisory Board[edit]

I note that the entire (and very large) advisory board seems to be listed, including a number of presumably non-notable individuals (no wiki article). Is this useful to the reader? What about paring it down somewhat, to a "List of notable people on the Editorial Advisory Board"? Plazak (talk) 16:17, 21 November 2011 (UTC)