Talk:The Twilight Zone

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject The Twilight Zone
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject The Twilight Zone, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Twilight Zone on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 
WikiProject Television (Rated B-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of television on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Comics (Rated B-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.
 B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
 
WikiProject United States / American Television (Rated B-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
 B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject American television (marked as Mid-importance).
 
WikiProject Horror (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
 C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Contents

[edit] Formatting

Do you think It would be appropriate to instead of having everything across so many pages, condense the data a little bit. like for example, The twilight zone is a........ The show ran for a ttal of X seasons. and then at the bottom have

List of episodes

Oh and maybe have the season's pages also have some brief info, you know like, Which was the first color season, or if they changed writers, or producers, or anything like that?

Sorry, been doing other things than this Twilight Zone thing. I guess a quicklink type thing to each season listing would be ok, but I think we should keep the current format for list of Twilight Zone episodes, and I agree information about each season should be added, but there's a hell of alot of information that could be added which I haven't had time to. Smelialichu 20:39 Nov 7, 2002 (UTC)

[edit] First Sentence

Can't the main article be rearranged so the table of contents comes up closer to the top of the page? New readers coming to this entry in Wikipedia will be served better if the table of contents is not buried under an unnecessarily long, lengthy paragraph. It is easier to read if a section heading is created right after the first or second sentences.

[edit] Introductory paragraph

(deleted entry) The information has now been returned to the main page, just in a new format. Ryan Anderson 23:57, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I'm planning on continuing my work on this page, adding a section on each season for the two revival series, splitting the radio/book/comic section off into seperate pages, adding a section on syndication and re-release and another on the colluqial use of "twilight zone", but at the moment I'm bogged down by semester finals. Good to see that, apparently, this page and the episode pages are getting more traffic since I started revamping it; there's been a significant increase in my watchlist events lately. Thanks, everybody Ryan Anderson 07:02, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Size concerns

I'm running awfully close to 32KB and I still have a lot of info I want to add, so I broke off the part about the books/comic books and the radio revival and made them independent stubs. This (below) is the only thing I cut which is not reproduced elsewhere, I add it here because I haven't decided what to do with it yet and I don't want to insult the contributor by removing it outright. I don't want to break up the original series and its revival series, but I'll probably have to. I'm considering options. Any help is appreciated.

How about creating a seperate page for all the famous people who've been on the show? As it is, it's to hard to read, anyway.Metalrobot 14:53, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cultural References

The Simpsons Halloween episodes usually have one segment which spoofs a classic Twilight Zone episode.

  • Episodes spoofed
    • To Serve Man
    • Nightmare at 20,000 feet
    • It's a Good Life
    • Living Doll


Additionally, there are countless references buried within Futurama. I won't add them because I'm biased, and I think there's a policy somewhere on that... So someone else can. Buddy13 11:33, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Some day, when I have several hours to spare, I'd like to create a The Twilight Zone in popular culture page, move all of the spoofs and cultural references from each episode's page, to that page, and provide a See also link for each page with a pop culture reference. Some pages (like Nightmare at 20,000, or It's a Good Life) have so many, and they're starting to get duplicated here. Some pop culture sites and shows (like the Simpsons, or the Tower of Terror ride) apply to several episodes. If someone else wants to do this before I get to it, please do. Travisl 20:06, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wow, this page has been royally screwed up

I guess that's what I get for working on Wikipedia. I tried to add some order and method to the mania a couple years ago, by creating all the seperate pages found on the disambiguation page, giving each series its own page and eliminating the fanboy Trivia sections (which are explictly against Wikipedia rules). But somehow, all of that clutter ended up back on the page, and what was supposed to be an introduction to the series has somehow become a complete list of guest stars!

I would dig in there and clean it all out again, but I'm afraid I don't have the heart... or the stomach, for it anymore :)

Ryan Anderson 06:12, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Talking about screwed up, some of the Twilight Zone episodes were mixed up. I would frequently ask "What happend next?". On the other hand some episodes like "The Howling" needed a begining. How did they catch the devil? "Obsolite" bordered on the rediculous. Overall, Twilight Zone was one of the greatest shows ever made.

I'm going to start a major overhaul on the episodes page starting in session 2, wish me luck -wikimindless

[edit] Guest stars

For years I have been guessing at the well-known actors who did the most episodes on the TZ. My guess was Burgess Meredith and Jack Klugman. Both of these were verified by the current page (July, 2006). Also, I found out that John Anderson also did 4 episodes. I just thought that this fact (3 actors at 4 episodes each) might be a good trivia/almanac/breakout suggestion. You have all done a great job on this subject. Thank you, Jeffrey

[edit] Updates

I finished the Nick of time page (02:42, 1 December 2006 (UTC))

[edit] Notable Guest Stars

I moved the Notable Guest Stars to the main article referenced The Twilight Zone (1959 TV series), its better suited there as it is about that specific incarnation of The Twilight Zone. this article is lengthy already and about The Twilight Zone as a whole, not each specific incarnation. Chad 08:11, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cleanup

I have done a major overhual on this screwed up page taking out and intergrating most trivia, into a Popular Culture segment, shortening information found on separate pages regarding specific incarnations of The Twilight Zone, info in this article is stated independently in those pages and theres no need to state things 2-3 times, I have condensed alot of info and redid/reworded various info, to help to make a more complete and to the point article, hopefully this will be to everyones liking and people can stop re-adding info that has been stated elsewhere and/or is non-relevent to this particular page. Chad 08:39, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Second Revival

The Second Revival section references the episode "The Monsters Are Due on Maple Street" which is referred to and explained somewhat earlier in the article. Additionally, the title of the updated episode is referred to as "similarly titled" and then referenced as the same title. This article seems to require major clean-up overall.Megyn 11:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pop. culture

Moving it here (see WP:AVTRIV), going to be a job and a half to integrate it :-\..

Hidden as it's large. --Matthew.

A job-and-a-half indeed. See my 15 May 2006 comment above -- I'm in favor of a separate Twilight Zone in pop culture page, with every pop culture thing from here, and every pop culture refrerence from each of the individual episode pages, moved into one spot. Thoughts? Travisl 22:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey Travis, sounds good to me, however people do have a tendency to try and get these pages deleted (e.g. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of references in Dead Like Me). Oh, and 4400 returns soon *yey!*. Matthew 22:57, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
I'm not a fan of trivia articles, but if all the less important references were left out it might be a decent ist. Things like the Naken Gun reference are highly significant, because it actually involves an original cast member. A list like this could soon become an ongoing list full of sightings of every single mention of the The Twilight Zone in another show, which wouldn't be useful. Croxley 20:30, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Improvements to individual episode articles

I mentioned this at Talk:The Twilight Zone (1959 TV series) but it might be useful here as well, regarding articles on List of The Twilight Zone episodes and I noticed some (minor) style errors common to most of them -

1. They have an unusual section at the bottom that is redundant because these articles are already accessed in the Infobox on the right. Back to: The Twilight Zone, Episode List, Season 1

This is sometimes listed under "Twilight Zone links", but is still not needed when the infobox has all the relevant links. This appears to date back to 2002, before the infobox was added.

2. The "External link" section is often placed in the middle of the article, but it should always be placed at the end (and called "External links", even if there is only 1 link)

3. Now a seperate subcategory exists for Category:The Twilight Zone episodes, the episode articles should be removed from the main Category:The Twilight Zone. This is the point of having a subcategory and will make Category:The Twilight Zone episodes much easier to use.

4. Another point: regarding the Themes section in many of the articles; most of these consist of mini reviews which are POV, or theories of what the underlying meaning/message/moral of each story is, which violates WP:NOR. Any type of analasys like this must cite a reliable source. The same goes for statements such as "this episode is similar to another episode called... etc".

Magiclite 21:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Theme music?

An article about this series really needs to include some mention of the theme music, which may be the most famous and widely referenced specific aspect of the series. However, I don't know anything about the theme music (who composed it, for example, or whether the same music was used for the entire original run of the show), so I can't write this. Could someone else add that info? --Elysdir 17:11, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:TheTwilightZoneLogo.jpg

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:TheTwilightZoneLogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:02, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Time20.jpg

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Time20.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Added rationale. Travisl (talk) 23:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Give The Time Element its own page?

Does anybody else think we should give The Time Element its own page? I think it's just as important as an episode. There's a precedent for it, too; the Pilot for ST:TOS (The Cage) has it's own page.Father McKenzie (talk) 02:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Opening Narration ?

I was expecting to find the narration from the intro in this article, like the control voice listed in The Outer Limits. I can't remember exactly how it went, but something like:

You unlock this door with the key of imagination ... Beyond it is another dimension (where the pit of mans fears meets the summit of his imagination) A diminsion of sight a dimension of sound a dimintion of mind the signpost up ahead you're entering to twilight zone....

I'm not 100% on the line that is currently in parentheses I think there was a line like it but not exactly this. please someone correct it and remove the parentesis thank you.

Does anyone know the rest of this, when it first appeared and can someone put it somewhere in the article ? --Biatch (talk) 04:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Season 1's intro is at The Twilight Zone (1959 TV series). The other seasons should probably be updated there, too. I'll see if I can find them tonight. Travisl (talk) 18:12, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Biyearly Marathon

Every year on the Sci-Fi channel there's a marathon. It doesn't show all the episodes (at least it didn't this year), but it shows over 40 hours. Also I don't know whether it's worth mentioning in the article. I can remember watching it last year. It's on right now from July 3-5 with only about a 2-hour break in between, in case you want to check it out. Hope I didn't post too late in case anyone wanted to see it. Wikifan4 (talk) 03:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Another marathon takes place yearly on New Year's Eve and goes into New Year's Day. Wikifan4 (talk) 18:24, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

This year, the marathon begins on July 2, making it even longer than last year (see above). It still runs into early morning July 5. Wikifan4 (talk) 23:28, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

This year, the marathon begins with episodes from the 1985 Twilight Zone series. Not until July 3 does the 1959 series begin showing episodes. With the combined 1985 and 1959 series' episodes, it is longer than previous years' Twilight Zone marathons, however, less original 1959 series Twilight Zone episodes will be shown. Since it is longer this year, there are two 2-hour breaks instead of the usual one. Wikifan4 (talk) 19:14, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

A correction to the above statement: there was a 3-hour break after the second day of the 2009 marathon. I'm not sure about after the first day, though. Wikifan4 (talk) 16:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

There will be a New Year's Eve/Day marathon on December 31, 2009 through January 2010 as there was last year. Wikifan4 (talk) 03:49, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

I think some syndicated NYC-based television network showing marathon epsiodes of The Twilight Zone in the 1980's, or 1990's, during a holiday such as Dec.31 or July 4 was where the idea of tv networks airing marathon viewing of tv shows or movies during a holiday came from. I don't recall a network airing marathon epsidoes of a program in the 1970's or earlier.204.80.61.110 (talk) 19:46, 31 December 2009 (UTC)Bennett Turk

It saddens me to report that there will not be a 4th of July Twilight Zone marathon this year (2010). The SyFy Channel has decided to show a different show instead. Hopefully the New Year's one will still run. I wonder if this is the end of biyearly marathons of the show. . . Wikifan4 (talk) 22:11, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

There was a marathon for the 2011 new year, and there will be a 2011 4th of July marathon running on SyFy from July 3-5 in America. Wikifan4 (talk) 17:15, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:The Twilight Zone 1985.jpg

The image Image:The Twilight Zone 1985.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Fixed. Travisl (talk) 17:56, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Cultural Influence

There really should be a section regarding the cultural influence of this show. Oh, not a "Cultural references" section. Rather, a discussion about the influence the show had on Television and pop culture in general. Twilight Zone was an incredibly influential show. --65.31.110.13 (talk) 09:15, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Source for creation and conception and reception

There is a source that can be creation and conception and reception of specific episodes. The Twilight Zone Companion (Marc Scott Zicree, December 1982, Bantam Books) is a good one. WhisperToMe (talk) 21:15, 24 January 2010 (UTC)


[edit] Third revival

The third revival part needs to be deleted or sourced. There is no evidence anywhere of plans for a third revival. I suspect this to be untrue. 89.124.85.146 (talk) 05:54, 27 May 2010 (UTC) and it dis so i deleted it but,someday one of us will revive twilight zone to CBS and if we did and we get proof in newspaper weput it in wiki article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Belrien12 (talkcontribs) 10:24, 30 May 2010 (UTC)


[edit] Theater/Drama merger

I have merged the Drama section into the Theater section; I don't see the need for both. The Drama section mentioned only one production by Little Rock Christian Academy in 2008 and asserted that said production was the "first ever" theater adaptation. I removed this assertion as Theater Schmeter has been producing them since 1996 and there was another production previous to Little Rock's by 4 Letter Entertainment, both mentioned in the Theater section. I question whether Little Rock's production is notable enough to mention at all; it would seem to be nothing more than a school play, but I didn't want to remove it without knowing more. Anyone know any reason why it should stay? Floggolozzo (talk) 18:57, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Title origin

The last sentence of the article's introduction is "Rod Serling himself chose the title of the series, and said that only after the series aired did he discover that the "twilight zone" was also a term applied by the US Air Force to the terminator, the border between "night" and "day" on a planetary body." This sentence implies that Serling did not know what the word "twilight" meant and simply chose it for its sound. This seems very improbable, and since there is no attached source, I vote to delete this sentence. Besides, I believe it's NASA or some other agency like that that works with astrophysical and celestial mechanics, and not the USAF. Just a thought. Eridani (talk) 18:17, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Source

[edit] Background information and comparison

[edit] missing from literature

I have "Rod Serling's the Twilight Zone" 10 stories(ISBN: 0-448-12485-8)1963, and "Twiligt Zone Revisited" 13 stories 1964 (no ISBN listed in the book). Neither are listed under literature, thinking of adding them? TacfuJecan (talk) 05:42, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export