Talk:The Vault (wiki)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Websites / Computing  (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (marked as Low-importance).
 
WikiProject Video games (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

File:Wiki-wordmark.png Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

Image-x-generic.svg

An image used in this article, File:Wiki-wordmark.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:07, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --92.145.167.145 (talk) 01:35, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

A conflict opposes members from fallout wikia and the vault on gamepedia, making this deletion questionable.

Any conflict is not relevant to the notability of an article. 86.184.183.73 (talk) 02:14, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --92.145.167.145 (talk) 01:41, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

This deletion is motivated by a personal conflict between users from wikia and gamepedia.

Any personal dispute is not relevant to the notability of an article. 86.184.183.73 (talk) 02:14, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --92.145.167.145 (talk) 01:48, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Vandalism

It is not vandalism to question the notability of an article. Disputing the deletion 3 times, twice for the same reason, might be. Is the page notable or self promotion?. It is a site with few active users 86.184.183.73 (talk) 02:14, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because this site is not only still very active it is constantly verifying and expanding on its content.--Ant2242 (talk) 02:39, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

The request for deletion is part of an aggressive campaign motivated by personal conflict, as is the demand that notability is established. As The Vault was already covered in mainstream gaming press due to its extensive nature and release of numerous materials obtained by the editors from inside source, the notability is well established.
The identity of the person responsible for the tag is Eden2012, who has deliberately and maliciously tried to abuse Wikipedia's Deletion policies to remove this. This is yet another example of harassment The Vault has endured at the keyboard of said user. I don't believe that a challenge to the notability or the very presence of the article borne out of personal spite can be sustained, due to the agenda of the person who puts forward this challenge.
I'd like to point out that the article has stood unchallenged for years, with proper citations establishing its notability. Tagaziel (talk) 07:05, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Arguing against a person rather than the argument seems to be an example of an Ad_hominem#Abusive Falacy. The "Test of Time" or appeal to tradition is additonally a falacical argument. 80.254.158.12 (talk) 18:30, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Not going to be deleted, I suspect the speedy tag was placed in bad faith. There are plenty of sources and coverage here, according to a past AfD it's notable. Яehevkor 19:03, 22 January 2014 (UTC)