Talk:Then Came Bronson

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Then Came Bronson article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

POV Tag[edit]

The extra information on the show is good, but it needs to be re-written to be more encyclopedic and represent a neutral POV. -- MisterHand 06:06, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I am new to Wiki, but I'll get the hang of it. I have edited the article to present, what I believe, is a neutral POV.-- Luigibob 23:59, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

March 1, 2006 changes[edit]

I've made several changes to the article and removed the tag. All the deleted material is in history, so if it needs to be added back in in some form it can be easily retrieved. Here's what I changed, and why:

Removed "forlorn" in the description of Bronson, felt POV.
Removed flowery intro about "The Odyssey" and "On the Road." While well written, it wasn't very encyclopedic and read like original research. However, if we can attribute some of these statements to an external notable source, it could be added back in some form.
Removed the dialogue. I couldn't figure out how it helped the article or why it was important. If that can be asserted, then this too could be reinstated.
Reformatted the guest stars information into an easier-to-read list.

I didn't want to step on any toes by removing material, just get the article to a place where we could remove the POV tag. -- MisterHand 00:11, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

January 22, 2007 edits[edit]

Well, I'm no longer new to Wiki and the changes I've made reflect POV deletes. Also, the previous edits to OVERVIEW were written like a television review, which were good, yet not an encyclopedic entry. Many deletes and corrections to reflect this view. Luigibob 03:58, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links & deletions[edit]

To who it may concern: Recent additions & quick deletions have been made to the article all in the good name of removing SPAM links. Common sense should always prevail and I have added the link one, and hopefully, the last time. The external link is a valuable resource to readers of the Then came Bronson article. Please do not delete link. It should also be noted that I was not the one who originated the link addition. Since the artivcle is on my watch list I was made aware of it. Luigibob (talk) 21:20, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]