An anonymous user had changed "is a special case of this pronoun" to "is an incorrect use of this pronoun". I reverted it back. It is NPOV to state that it is incorrect. The article already documents that this usage is disputed. Wikipedia ought not to judge this correct or incorrect, only acknowledge how people actually use the word, and link to the dispute.--RLent (talk) 20:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
3p miller real name bobby Johnson born 1989 miller a singer a leader of the band piz zip has a green deer friend named moon star called him 3p 3p smokes, drink and bad behaver yellow hair age (23) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 19:00, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
3p miller real name bobby Johnson born 1989 miller a singer a leader of the band piz zip has a green deer friend named moon star called him 3p 3p smokes, drink and bad behaver yellow hair age (23) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 19:02, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
As noted by many historians, singular "they" was often used as "de facto" gender-neutral pronoun along with the presumption of "he". Also within the last 100 years or so "they" has become taboo for gender neutral pronouns. It seems silly to omit one group of people by potentially offending another (using "her" as a gender neutral pronoun in place of "he"). Likewise, it also seems silly to invent a pronoun when the language already has use of another one (itself a borrowed word). "They" was a commonly used pronoun for 3S, until British parliament ordered "he" be used for a generic 3S. To say "they" 3S is taboo when it has historical precedent is ostrich-like behavior :-) http://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Singular_they.htmlhttp://www.psmag.com/culture/gender-neutral-pronouns-actually-doomed-67600/— Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 01:28, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose. Article about the word should remain as the primary topic of the term "They". No sufficient reason has been provided otherwise. An article about the word, or any other subject, does not automatically disqualify it from being a primary topic. Zzyzx11 (talk) 02:12, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Oppose per above - Clearly a primary topic. –Davey2010 • (talk) 18:07, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Comment Did you notice this one? You are just wasting your time adding this individually. Next time, follow this format.
== Requested moves ==
| new1 = New title for page 1 with the talk page hosting this discussion
| current2 = Current title of page 2
| new2 = New title for page 2
| current3 = Current title of page 3
| new3 = New title for page 3
| reason = Place here your rationale for the proposed page name change, ideally referring to applicable naming convention policies and guidelines, and providing evidence in support where appropriate. If your reasoning includes search engine results, please default to Google Books or Google News Archive before providing any web results. Do not sign this.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.