Talk:Tiffany & Co.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 January 2020 and 4 March 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tiffellington.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes , supported .
Is this a stock company?
Is it possible to buy stocks/shares "Tiffany & Co." to buy ? sanks195.244.167.108 (talk) 15:59, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1885, Scientific American, T&CO Mummy Eye Necklace[edit]

this is bizarre and probably needs attention from someone more familiar with Tiffany.
"A Necklace of Mummy Eyes"
The material for a unique necklace is now in the hands of (Messrs), Tiffany & Co, of New York, and is awaiting the attention of their workmen. It consists of a large collection of very beautiful mummy eyes, which were brought from Peru by Mr. W E Curtis, of the South American Commission. The majority of them came from Arica, where large cemetaries are filled with mummies of the ancient Incas ... ... ... ... ...
https://books.google.com/books?id=J4U9AQAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false (pp 240, 17-Oct-1885).
SloppyTots (talk) 00:55, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you suggesting we add this to the article? It seems undue to me. Tiffany sells many products, and we only talk about three of them. GA-RT-22 (talk) 03:29, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'll defer to other editors. Just wanted to share this bizarre article with the forum.SloppyTots ([[User talk:SloppyTots|talk

Blackpink[edit]

I have again removed the part about blackpink. First, this is WP:UNDUE. Second, it's sourced to WP:RSSELF. Third, nothing has happened yet, it's just an announcement. Fourth, there is no such thing as the 2021s decade. GA-RT-22 (talk) 22:00, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article has a lot of advertising language and non-notable inclusions[edit]

It's easy to acknowledge that an article on luxury goods is bound to have some fluffy wording and insignificant-but-flowery details, but much of this page is not encyclopedic. Cate Blanchett's turquoise necklace in the 2015 Academy Awards is not notable. Social media campaigns about being a for-realsies-global-citizen-do-gooder are not notable. Because of these factors I will be tagging this page as an advert. Mewnst (talk) 08:43, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree completely and thank you for working on this. I have cut some small bits here and there but the article could use a good going-over. GA-RT-22 (talk) 12:33, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]