Talk:Titles Deprivation Act 1917

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lower Saxony (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lower Saxony, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Lower SaxonyWikipedia:WikiProject Lower SaxonyTemplate:WikiProject Lower SaxonyLower Saxony articles

Austria Low‑importance

	Austria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

British Royalty Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Salic Law[edit]

In addition, due to Salic Law, neither Victoria nor her descendents could ascend to the throne of the Kingdom of Hanover. As such the throne of Hanover went to her uncle Ernest Augustus and his male descendents.

The relevance of this passage, I suspect, is not obvious to the uninitiated; so I radically rewrote it. —Tamfang (talk) 09:48, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccuracy[edit]

The article presently reads:

on March 28, 1919, the King issued an Order-in-Council depriving the following persons of their titles:
HRH The Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (Duke of Albany, Earl of Clarence, Baron Arklow and a Prince of the United Kingdom)

HRH The Crown Prince of Hanover (Duke of Cumberland and Teviotdale, Earl of Armagh and a Prince of the United Kingdom)

HRH The Duke of Brunswick (a Prince of the United Kingdom)

The Viscount Taaffe (Viscount Taaffe and Baron Ballymote)

The Duke of Cumberland and the Duke of Brunswick no longer bore any British princely titles; these had been restricted to grandchildren of the Sovereign (and the eldest son of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales) by Letters Patent of 30 November 1917. The Duke of Brunswick therefore had no British titles of which he could be deprived. In a post to newsgroup alt.talk.royalty on 16 October 1996, citing Burke's Peerage as a source, Noel McFerran says that the Duke of Brunswick was named in the Order-in-Council which deprived the Dukes of Albany and Cumberland and the Viscount Taaffe of their titles, but only as being expressly forbidden from petitioning for the restoration of his father's peerage titles as would otherwise have been his right under the Act. Opera hat (talk) 12:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The report of the Privy Council named (in its words):

- His Royal Highness Leopold Charles, Duke of Albany, Earl of Clarence and Baron Arklow.
- His Royal Highness Ernest Augustus, Duke of Cumberland and Teviotdale, Earl of Armagh.
- His Royal Highness Ernest Augustus (Duke of Brunswick), Prince of Great Britain and Ireland.
- Henry, Viscount Taaffe of Corren and Baron of Ballymote.

So it would appear that Burke's is mistaken (now there's a surprise...). Proteus (Talk) 13:08, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

authorisation[edit]

The Titles Deprivation Act 1917 ... authorised enemies ... to be deprived of their British peerages and royal titles.

I'm not happy with this use of 'authorised': it seems to say that the Act allowed such persons to choose to be deprived! —Tamfang (talk) 23:51, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed amendment to the Titles Deprivation Act[edit]

Should we mention MP Bob Seely's coming proposed amendment to the act, concerning the current Duke of Sussex? GoodDay (talk) 15:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Random backbencher proposes something that nobody's heard of and we don't even mention on the page about him? DuncanHill (talk) 15:57, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]