This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NPOV:Alabama Cooperative Extension System, written almost entirely by a news and public affairs employee at ACES, so needs some neutral eyes to give it a going-over to check for both neutrality, and layout/content inclusion, etc.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 09:43, August 2, 2014 (JST, Heisei 26) (Refresh)
What's this rubbish about being 'bigger than 3 mile island' without anything but alarmist and highly speculative reference? There have been NO REACTOR EXPLOSIONS. The explosions have occurred around the reactor; not as part of it. There is little to no radiation; it's the kind of radiation you'd get from opening a microwave or CD-player 10 minutes after use. Talk about alarmism. i'm deleting this nonsense until an investigation and credible reports have surfaced -after the plant is contained or after it has actually blown up. 220.127.116.11 (talk) 09:42, 18 March 2011 (UTC)M0F02000
Indeed; rephrased some days ago... L.tak (talk) 10:42, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Total rubbish, it is officially level 5 as serious as 3MI and food is now contaminated. Do not cover up these facts and stop vandalising! This is insult to the workers risking their lives to cool the plant, the facts are cited and justified in this entry.
It's not vandalism: there has been no breach of the reactor itself. Explain that without hyperbole, please? And tell me -why is that they are re-starting one of the reactors to produce electricty at Fukushima I if the explosion was a so-called nuclear disaster. Your references tro media speculation do nothing to support the flaw of your argument. YOU are the vandal, thank-you very much. Not I.18.104.22.168 (talk) 09:45, 20 March 2011 (UTC)M0F0
Where is the evidence to substantiate the claim that one of the Fukushima I reactors is to be re-started? You both need to stick to the cold facts and provide citations for your claims. 22.214.171.124 (talk) 20:51, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Is there a reason that the 'thermal' plant list is not titled 'fossil fuel'? It looks like all the plants there are fossil fuel plants; and the 'thermal' title is unnecessarily vague (both nuclear & geothermal facilities fall under the thermal heading, but are naturally listed separately)
Anyone have an objection to changing that title? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 15:05, 4 April 2011 (UTC)