Talk:Tokyo Electric Power Company

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Companies (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Energy (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Japan / Tokyo (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 09:43, August 2, 2014 (JST, Heisei 26) (Refresh)
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by the Tokyo task force.
 

Size of Tepco[edit]

I am sure that TEPCO is not the fourth largest electric power company in the world. The article should be updated.79.10.112.216 (talk) 16:09, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Name?[edit]

Why is this article titled "The Tokyo Electric Power Company", rather than just the "Tokyo Electric Power Company"?

changed some time ago... L.tak (talk) 10:45, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Water Canons (on the way?)[edit]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/vp/42120956%2342120956#42121221 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.52.165.200 (talk) 04:46, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Ownership (significant equity packages)?[edit]

Who owns TEPCO? Inquiring minds want to know. 212.188.109.138 (talk) 12:20, 17 March 2011 (UTC)


Who owns the other 45% of the company? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.25.69.67 (talk) 22:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Comparison with 3 Mile Island[edit]

What's this rubbish about being 'bigger than 3 mile island' without anything but alarmist and highly speculative reference? There have been NO REACTOR EXPLOSIONS. The explosions have occurred around the reactor; not as part of it. There is little to no radiation; it's the kind of radiation you'd get from opening a microwave or CD-player 10 minutes after use. Talk about alarmism. i'm deleting this nonsense until an investigation and credible reports have surfaced -after the plant is contained or after it has actually blown up. 119.161.71.12 (talk) 09:42, 18 March 2011 (UTC)M0F02000

Indeed; rephrased some days ago... L.tak (talk) 10:42, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Warning To vandal[edit]

Total rubbish, it is officially level 5 as serious as 3MI and food is now contaminated. Do not cover up these facts and stop vandalising! This is insult to the workers risking their lives to cool the plant, the facts are cited and justified in this entry.

It's not vandalism: there has been no breach of the reactor itself. Explain that without hyperbole, please? And tell me -why is that they are re-starting one of the reactors to produce electricty at Fukushima I if the explosion was a so-called nuclear disaster. Your references tro media speculation do nothing to support the flaw of your argument. YOU are the vandal, thank-you very much. Not I.119.161.71.12 (talk) 09:45, 20 March 2011 (UTC)M0F0
Where is the evidence to substantiate the claim that one of the Fukushima I reactors is to be re-started? You both need to stick to the cold facts and provide citations for your claims. 94.116.12.116 (talk) 20:51, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

'Thermal' plant list[edit]

Is there a reason that the 'thermal' plant list is not titled 'fossil fuel'? It looks like all the plants there are fossil fuel plants; and the 'thermal' title is unnecessarily vague (both nuclear & geothermal facilities fall under the thermal heading, but are naturally listed separately)

Anyone have an objection to changing that title? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.175.27.219 (talk) 15:05, 4 April 2011 (UTC)