|WikiProject Computing||(Rated Start-class)|
|WikiProject Free Software / Software / Computing||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
- I don't really agree with your opinion, but the only citation in the article is useless so I removed the refs section along with the citation. — LazyEditor (talk|contribs) 09:54, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
I don't know who Paul Betts is, but I don't understand how his programming blog is "MediaWiki interface development", or for that matter, why "MediaWiki interface development" is an external link for Tomboy. Maybe I'm missing something, so I'm leaving it in, but I'd like some insight. Chruck 16:54, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
"Unstable" on Windows?
Is there a source for this, or is it just one person's experience? --22.214.171.124 19:15, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
I moved the reference used to support the claim it has a smaller footprint and better performance  so that it only supports the claim it is written in C. For starters, the conboy website is obviously not a reliable source for that sort of claim. Secondly the website doesn't even seem to make the claim. They say "Written completely in C it starts fast and doesn't take much memory" which is quite different from saying it is faster and takes less memory. Nil Einne (talk) 09:34, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
The version for Tomboy in this article has been changed several times recently, and it is currently set to be 1.4.2 (a recent development version) while the Tomboy website still states the latest stable release to be 1.2.0.
I will now revert the article to show that version. Please feel free to discuss. --oKtosiTe talk 16:21, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- Tomboy follows the Linux kernel's versioning scheme where the minor version is even if the release is stable or odd if it is a development version. 1.4.2 is the latest stable (1.3.x were development releases). See here: http://projects.gnome.org/tomboy/download.html NovellGuy (talk) 18:01, 1 March 2011 (UTC)