Talk:Torricelli's law

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Torricelli's law article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Physics: Fluid Dynamics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

Engineering

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Jj[edit]

Jj 45.123.8.196 (talk) 10:54, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Derivation[edit]

I'm pretty sure the derivation assumes v_1=0 by taking the pressure at the bottom to be \rho*g*h, so it is wrong and confusing. The result says that a larger aperture yields a stronger stream, which is counter-intuitive and not conserving energy. I'm not an expert in fluid dynamics, but I suggest to let an expert review this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wengro (talk • contribs) 21:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]