Talk:Tragic Lovers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Albums (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Classical music / Contemporary music 
WikiProject icon Tragic Lovers is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Contemporary music task force.
 
WikiProject Oregon (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
The current collaborations of the month are List of lakes in Oregon & List of hospitals in Oregon.
WikiProject Richard Wagner  
WikiProject icon This article falls within the scope of the Richard Wagner WikiProject, a collaboration to develop articles on the composer and his operas. The project talk page is a place to discuss issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
WikiProject icon A version of this article was copyedited by Jonesey95, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 24 November 2013. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English and Wikipedia's policies and guidelines to help in the drive to improve articles. Visit our project page if you're interested in joining! If you have questions, please direct them to our talk page.
 

COI[edit]

In accordance with Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, I have chosen to disclose that I have a personal connection to this subject. I will spare details, but my main purpose in writing this article is to benefit Wikipedia and its mission. I believe this article is written from a neutral perspective and has been constructed from independent, reliable sources. The second link above provides the following summary, which I believe I have followed appropriately:

  • Be transparent about your conflict of interest (Yes check.svg Done)
  • Subjects require significant coverage in independent reliable sources. (Yes check.svg Done)
  • Your role is to inform and reference, not promote or sell. (Yes check.svg Done)
  • Be extremely cautious about the risks of editing articles about yourself or your clients (Yes check.svg Done|N/A)
  • If writing a draft, write without bias, as if you don't work for the company or personally know the subject. (Yes check.svg Done)
  • State facts and statistics, don't be vague or general. (Yes check.svg Done)
  • Take time to get sources and policy right. (Yes check.svg Done)
  • Get neutral, uninvolved, disinterested editors to review your draft. ( Doing...) Yes check.svg Done
  • Work with the community and we'll work with you. ( Doing...) Yes check.svg Done
  • Communicate, communicate, communicate. ( Doing...) Yes check.svg Done

My ultimate goal is to promote this article to Good status. I understand this will require review and assistance from other members of the community, which is great. I invite all to examine this article carefully to make sure the content is fair and accurate. Feel free to contact me if you have any concerns. --Another Believer (Talk) 21:14, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Update: The article has received a copy edit. I have requested feedback from members of WikiProject Oregon. --Another Believer (Talk) 16:38, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tragic Lovers/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 03:02, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: Another Believer (Talk)

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have my full review up shortly. --Seabuckthorn  03:02, 12 January 2014 (UTC)


1: Well-written

2: Verifiable with no original research

3: Broad in its coverage

4: Neutral

5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes

6: Images Yes check.svg Done (NFC with a valid FUR) & (PD)

As per the above checklist, the issues identified are:

  • The lead does not Provide an accessible overview and does not give Relative emphasis to Broadcasts and Reception. These major points should be incorporated in the lead.
  • The lead does not Provide an accessible overview and does not give Relative emphasis to Composition. The lead is all composition at present.

This article is a very promising GA nominee. I'm glad to see your work here. I'm putting it on hold. All the best. --Seabuckthorn  03:03, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Better? --Another Believer (Talk) 16:22, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Best. --Seabuckthorn  16:35, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

OK, everything looks good now. Passing the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn  16:35, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Seabuckthorn, thank you so much for your time and assistance. --Another Believer (Talk) 16:44, 15 January 2014 (UTC)