Talk:Timothy DeLaGhetto

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Hip hop

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 March 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

False Information[edit]

There is a lot of false information, He lives in Paramount not Long Beach, and other is just Trivia, why does it matter to this article that he's worked with D-Pryde and Lil Crazed? there's also a lot of Grammar mistakes someone put parodys instead of Parodies. can someone fix it? I'd do it myself but I don't want to make things worse! thanks! Souper Chiva (talk) 00:52, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead an cleaned up the page.Souper Chiva (talk) 01:44, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

People keep adding false information without adding any sources. I went ahead and cleaned it up a bit. Souper Chiva (talk) 22:34, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added a Filmography Section[edit]

here are a few links for references, Thai Smile http://pdflofilms.bigcartel.com/product/thai-smile-dvd High School Sucks http://highschoolsucksmusical.com/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperChiva (talk • contribs) 01:19, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this article up for Deletion?[edit]

I see no contentious or libellous material? I mean, I could understand if his article contained his outspoken distrust for the showbiz, or belief in the illuminati and freemasons (all of which are only quotes as he has done no published material on the subjects), but the article itself only shows what is known about him, and what is verifiable online. He's a very important meme, and I don't believe it should be considered for deletion, but rather expanded to be more biographical as more information becomes reference.Joshua Torelli (talk) 17:09, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I Agree 100%, Souper Chiva (talk) 18:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay, someone nominated it for deletion, but a vote was cast and they decided to keep the page. :) Tom USA 16:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Official Stage Name[edit]

Was it determined or voted that his main stage name/article title should be Traphik? I know he uses both Traphik and Timothy DeLaGhetto, but he hardly seems to use Trpahik much anymore, except for his Facebook and twitter address. Should we change his man name to just Timothy DeLaGhetto and keep Traphik in the also known as section and first paragraph? Banan14kab (talk) 18:24, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Banan14kab. A quick Google search results in 827,000 hits for "Traphik" (in quotes) and 283,000 hits for "Timothy DeLaGhetto" (in quotes). It would seem that per WP:COMMONNAME, we should use the more common name, i.e. Traphik. On the other hand, when a company rebrands itself, we can change the article to reflect the new brand, if properly sourced. If there is some official statement from Chantarangsu that indicates he's dropped the name Traphik in favor of Timothy DeLaGhetto, then I would argue it's reasonable to move the article to the new name. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:38, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DeLaGhetto Edited this Page[edit]

Not sure if anyone cares but DeLaGhetto himself was behind this edit. He made as part of an FBE episode which seems to encourage vandalism/trollish behavior on Wikipedia/FANDOM (even though his edit was not very trollish, other editors in the video-- namely Smosh-- made more trollish edits to FANDOM because they were unable to bypass the protection on their Wikipedia page).

Might wanna keep a close eye on the IP. Just because it's the celebs vandalizing their own pages doesn't make it okay.

CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 01:41, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. We came down pretty hard on several interesting folks editing Wikipedia to paint themselves in a more flattering light. This was mostly a joke but that doesn't excuse it. RoboJesus3 (talk) 05:30, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]