Talk:Treaty of Brest-Litovsk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Military history (Rated B-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
WikiProject Estonia (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon Treaty of Brest-Litovsk is part of the WikiProject Estonia, a project to maintain and expand Estonia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
 C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Russia / History / Military (Rated C-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.
 C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.
 
WikiProject Former countries / Prussia  (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former Countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.
 C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Prussia.
 
WikiProject Germany (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Was Poland mentioned in the Treaty??? At the beginning it says it was NOT but later in the article the Terms section contradicts saying it IS. Someone please clarify. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.239.25.20 (talk) 10:47, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Looking at the treaty, it appears that Poland is only indirectly mentioned: "The territories lying to the west of the line agreed upon by the contracting parties which formerly belonged to Russia, will no longer be subject to Russian sovereignty." So Russia lost sovereignty over Congress Poland, but Poland was not specifically mentioned. john k (talk) 13:37, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Ottoman Empire

There are no mentioning of the delegates of the Ottoman Empire in the negotiations. It gives an unbalanced impression. --Xact (talk) 08:21, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Picture

There is no caption for the second picture down from the top. 21:16, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Picture

There is no caption for the second picture down from the top. 21:16, 6 March 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.126.0.7 (talk)

[edit] Citation Warning

I have resolved the lack of citations for the most part. How do I get the yellow warning removed from the top of the screen? Koniglich (talk) 02:44, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Andrik Fuller

This is nonsense, right? I can't find any evidence for this gentleman's existence, and he's not even mentioned in this article besides the intro. Is he a trap to see if undergraduates are using this article as a source for IDs on exams? (Very useful for me in grading exams, incidentally, but not a very good reason to include nonsense in the article.) john k (talk) 03:32, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Andrik Fuller was added without discussion by an anonymous editor here. Nonsense, obviously. john k (talk) 03:39, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export