Talk:Treaty of Devol

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Featured article Treaty of Devol is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophy This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 23, 2005.
Version 0.5      (Rated FA-Class)
Peer review This History article has been selected for Version 0.5 and subsequent release versions of Wikipedia. It has been rated FA-Class on the assessment scale.
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Albania (Rated FA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon Treaty of Devol is part of the WikiProject Albania, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Albania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
 FA  This article has been rated as FA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Greece (Rated FA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 FA  This article has been rated as FA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Middle Ages / Crusades  (Rated FA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 FA  This article has been rated as FA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Crusades task force.
 
WikiProject Law (Rated FA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
 FA  This article has been rated as FA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Military history (Rated FA-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. Featured
FA This article has been rated as FA-Class on the quality scale.
WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 

[edit] Short

Changed 1054 (??) to 1097, the correct year. 13 Nov 2005

Thanks...that was some leftover vandalism from June 22-23, when it was on the main page. Adam Bishop 19:07, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Fixed it, but no idea what was going on 24 June 2005

Have just checked the source text and the date in the first line (when the crusade started) is listed as 1054 1054 but comes out on my browser as 1654 - is there a fault? 24 June 2005

Is there a mismatch in the dates i.e. 1100's for the treaty then taliking about 1600's in the next paragraph, possibly a typo? 24 June 2005

Isn't this a bit too short to be a comprehensive FAC? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 20:49, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

How do you suggest it be made more comprehensive? Adam Bishop 22:17, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
An FAC doesn't have to be lengthy. This article seems to be very comprhenisve for something done in the 1100's. Falphin 18:40, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

219.130.58.19 has blanked this page numerous times today (Thu 23 June (EST))


Whoever has access to the encyclopedia/map from where the image was scanned, please scan it in in a much larger resolution and don't compress it so much (on this image the JPEG effects can be seen...)

[edit] Picture

Is there some picture for beginning of article?--Vojvodae please be free to write :) 10:49, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export