Talk:Treaty of Pereyaslav

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


I think this should become a disambig for Treaty of Pereyaslav (1654) and Treaty of Pereyaslav (1659). Any comments?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 23:34, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

I object. --Ghirla -трёп- 08:40, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
And why?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:02, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

There was also the Treaty of Pereyaslav (1630) (see Taras Fedorowicz). We most certainly do need a disambig.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  05:21, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Of course if there were other treaties the DAB is useful but there is certainly one treaty (this one) that ring most bells. So, if there is a dab, it shoud be under the Treaty of Pereyaslav (disambiguation) and this article should stay where it is with "otheruses" at the top. --Irpen 05:37, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

This is so evident that hardly needs discussing. --Ghirla -трёп- 07:11, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
This sounds like a good idea.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  07:27, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

I copied the paragraph "Second Treaty of Pereyslav" and created a new article Treaty of Pereyaslav (1659). If there are three, namely

why is the 1659 treaty called "Second"? Also, there are a lot of links coming in to Treaty of Pereyaslav. How do we know they really mean to link to the 1654 treaty? TrueColour (talk) 17:24, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Depends on the context of those articles. We should read them and when needed, pipe those inks to appropriate disambiguated articles. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:08, 11 October 2009 (UTC)