This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dacia, a WikiProject aimed to better organize and improve the quality and accuracy of the articles related to ancient Dacia and primarily to the history of Dacians, Getae and Moesi. If you would like to participate, please improve this article and/or join the project and help with our open tasks. If you have questions regarding the goals of the project, as well as the time span, space, people and culture in the project scope, please review them here. Your input is welcomed!
To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: | B1 <!-- Referencing and citations --> = y/n | B2 <!-- Coverage and accuracy --> = y/n | B3 <!-- Structure --> = y/n | B4 <!-- Grammar and style --> = y/n | B5 <!-- Supporting materials --> = y/n
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
the article is unreliable, we need references
I placed the "unreferenced" tag not only because of the lack of any reference (primary or secondary) but also because Gallus is a controversial emperor (some primary sources and modern scholars, in contrast with the article, consider him quite incapable or lazy). Dipa1965 (talk) 12:55, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
fixed it by adding some citations--Dipa1965 (talk) 08:39, 24 April 2010 (UTC)