Talk:Trial and error

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Philosophy (Rated Stub-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
 Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject History of Science  
WikiProject icon This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

[edit] Focused trials

TRIZ is a useful alternative approach to discovery. It differs markedly.

[edit] Praising error

Every time we attempt something we have a trial. If anything goes wrong in the attempt, we have an error. This makes trial and error exceedingly common in our lives. One curious effect is that when we succeed, then we have learned nothing new; that was what we expected. Yet that is the preferred and desired result.

We don't like it when we fail, but if we are wise, we will take each failure as an opportunity to learn something new. Thus, in a sense, failure is more valuable than success, in the long term. One formulation of this happy fact is Karpinski's maxim, "Anything worth doing, is worth doing badly, at first."

Jeff Raskin added those last two words before he included it in his seminal book, "The Humane Interface". Then it made more sense to him. I had previously preferred to let listeners ponder the absurdity of my claim for a while as a kind of zen exercise.

In fact, a central feature of venture capital in Silicon Valley, that hotbed of innovation in electronic technology, is that when you have failed in your first attempt to start a valuable company, you are not considered a worthless loser. Instead, to the venture capitalists on Sand Hill Road in Palo Alto, you are now an experienced executive, suitable to be funded to start another company.

We could even claim that failure is good for the soul. It teaches humility, and many lessons of what to beware of. Yet this view, so valuable in high technology ventures, is held very few places in the world.

Karpinski (talk) 00:51, 11 April 2008 (UTC) guess and check —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.109.147.205 (talk) 04:28, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export