This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
I have started the review. It does not have any cleanup banners and does not contain any seemingly copyright infringements, I will continue with the six good article criteria. Thank you. --AmritasyaPutraT 14:05, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Could you clarify "In the original Ramayana" in the lead? (Probably adding "by Valmiki" as done in the body?)
Removed word "original". Ramayana is introduced in the lead. RedtigerxyzTalk 11:39, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Could you clarify "Southeast Asian versions" (Probably substituting with "in the Thai Ramakien" as done in the body?)
Southeast Asian versions include Thai, Malay, Indonesian versions. Sentence is referenced in "Trijata and Sita" para 1. RedtigerxyzTalk 11:39, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
@Redtigerxyz: The lead has "Southeast Asian versions often depict her as the wife of Rama's monkey general Hanuman...", it the body it is present in "In the Thai Ramakien, Hanuman helps...". Am I mistaken? --AmritasyaPutraT 12:42, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Ok, right! All my queries are answered, I will continue with the review. --AmritasyaPutraT 12:56, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
The article looks well-written, neutral. I found a few reference which did not actually support the text but maybe I am not reading the translation correctly. I will continue the review after your response to the above feedback. Thank you. --AmritasyaPutraT 13:26, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
AmritasyaPutra, Thanks for starting the review. I may be a busy in real life over the next few days and may take taime to reply.RedtigerxyzTalk 11:39, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
^This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
^Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
^Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
^The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.