Talk:Trijata

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Hinduism (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject India (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
Note icon
This article was last assessed in September 2014.
WikiProject Mythology (Rated GA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Trijata/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AmritasyaPutra (talk · contribs) 14:04, 4 October 2014 (UTC)


Criteria[edit]

Review[edit]

  1. Well-written:
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (prose) Simple clear language used. Pass Pass
    (b) (MoS) As per discussion, the doubts in WP:LEAD are addressed. Pass Pass
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (references) It contains a list of all references presented in accordance with the layout style guideline, there are no dead links either. Pass Pass
    (b) (citations to reliable sources) There are no opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements. Pass Pass
    (c) (original research) It contains no original research. Pass Pass
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (major aspects) Yes, it coverts all major aspects. Pass Pass
    (b) (focused) As far as GA goes I think it is fairly focused. Pass Pass
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each.
    Notes Result
    Nothing incriminating, no suggestive wording in my view. Pass Pass
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
    Notes Result
    Stable. No ongoing edit war or content dispute. Pass Pass
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by images:
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) Yes, the images are tagged with their copyright status. Pass Pass
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) Yes, images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Pass Pass

Result[edit]

Result Notes
Pass Pass After discussed changes and per above comments I find it good against GA standard

Discussion[edit]

I have started the review. It does not have any cleanup banners and does not contain any seemingly copyright infringements, I will continue with the six good article criteria. Thank you. --AmritasyaPutraT 14:05, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Initial feedback on the lead:

  • Can you correct the Sanskrit spelling to त्रिजटा.
Corrected. Redtigerxyz Talk 11:39, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Could you clarify "In the original Ramayana" in the lead? (Probably adding "by Valmiki" as done in the body?)
Removed word "original". Ramayana is introduced in the lead. Redtigerxyz Talk 11:39, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Could you clarify "Southeast Asian versions" (Probably substituting with "in the Thai Ramakien" as done in the body?)
Southeast Asian versions include Thai, Malay, Indonesian versions. Sentence is referenced in "Trijata and Sita" para 1. Redtigerxyz Talk 11:39, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
@Redtigerxyz: The lead has "Southeast Asian versions often depict her as the wife of Rama's monkey general Hanuman...", it the body it is present in "In the Thai Ramakien, Hanuman helps...". Am I mistaken? --AmritasyaPutraT 12:42, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
AmritasyaPutra, The last para of "After the war" talks about Thai, Malay and Javanese traditions.Redtigerxyz Talk 12:52, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Ok, right! All my queries are answered, I will continue with the review. --AmritasyaPutraT 12:56, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

The article looks well-written, neutral. I found a few reference which did not actually support the text but maybe I am not reading the translation correctly. I will continue the review after your response to the above feedback. Thank you. --AmritasyaPutraT 13:26, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

AmritasyaPutra, Thanks for starting the review. I may be a busy in real life over the next few days and may take taime to reply.Redtigerxyz Talk 11:39, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the pass, AmritasyaPutra. Redtigerxyz Talk 05:33, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Additional notes[edit]

  1. ^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
  2. ^ Either parenthetical references or footnotes can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.
  3. ^ This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
  4. ^ Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
  5. ^ Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
  6. ^ The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.