Talk:Trinity (video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

David McGarry (1 participant)
Stumble Guys (7 participants)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (7 participants)
Carlos Pesina (1 participant)
Atlus USA (4 participants)
Danny Mastrogiorgio (2 participants)
Super Mutant (12 participants)
Police Trainer (1 participant; relisted)
Beam Invader (5 participants; relisted)
Sephiroth (20 participants; relisted)
The Boss (Metal Gear) (4 participants; relisted)
Silfade (2 participants; relisted)
List of Fate/Grand Order characters (12 participants; relisted)
Balloon Brothers (3 participants; relisted)
Enigma Engine (4 participants; relisted)
ClanLib (5 participants; relisted)
Dan Gelber (game designer) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Reference to Symbol[edit]

What does the Mercury symbol refer to? Mercury is a messenger god. Technically Uranus would've been the proper symbol in the case of a weapon detonated in space (in keeping with the scheme), rather than Mercury. However, Mercury was the symbol used, so what could the interpretation be? 71.214.233.202 07:09, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mercury is fast. The anti-missile satellite travels very fast in its orbit. Jkp1187 (talk) 20:15, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hometown.aol.com is now defunct[edit]

The bugs list is still at web.archive.org though. I'm not sure what WP does in this case, just change the link to web.archive.org? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.138.184.254 (talk) 04:52, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ideally the original site just moved and we'd follow. But failing that, Archive.org is a reasonable fallback. — Alan De Smet | Talk 04:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]