Talk:Truncated mean

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Statistics (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page or join the discussion.

Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
 

Winsorized mean[edit]

The Windsor mean or, more often, Winsorized mean is somewhat different, see the page for that measurePlf515 (talk) 02:01, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

What are the advantages/disadvantages of the two approaches? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.162.148 (talk) 05:27, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Drawbacks of Trimmed Mean??[edit]

This source (http://davidmlane.com/hyperstat/A11971.html) points out the fact that trimmed mean is actually better estimator of central tendency with highly skewed samples, since a median essentially is a 100% trimmed mean.

extract from the source: A trimmed mean is obviously less susceptible to the effects of extreme scores than is the arithmetic mean. It is therefore less susceptible to sampling fluctuation than the mean for extremely skewed distributions. It is less efficient than the mean for normal distributions

Unless I missunderstood something, please correct me if I did (it's not quite clear explanation), then the statement in the articlee is contradictory here!

thanks, --Martindavidsigi 21:07, 27 June 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martindavidsigi (talkcontribs)