Talk:Typology

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Typology is also a branch of linguistics which concerns itself with comparing the properties that languages have, disregarding their genetic relationshops.

What about sociology? We have for example a normal type and an ideal type. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 22:00, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)

This needs to be changed into a disambig. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 00:11, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Do we name articles typology (archaeology) etc.. ? Stbalbach 01:14, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 04:08, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclones?[edit]

On Effects of tropical cyclones, it uses typology, but I did not know where to change the link to, since this page does not mention it for any type of weather.--Mynameisnotpj (talk) 21:50, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to the current version of this page, the answer is to delink it or convert it to a dictionary link. Mark Hurd (talk) 01:39, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Baraminology[edit]

I removed the following, which only seems to be an excuse to include a link to baraminology.

Typology, in creation biology, a system for classifying life into groups known as baraminology

--TS 15:30, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-ambiguous titles[edit]

Many of the items on this page are, as far as I can tell, not actually ambiguous. That is, many of these things are not called "typology" as such; a reader looking for information about, say, the Oakeshott typology of swords would probably not search for "typology" without "Oakeshott". I therefore moved many of the links to the See also section.

It might be worthwhile to create a list or a broad-concept article discussing the various kinds of typologies created in different fields. Such an article could include links to most (all?) of the pages listed here. Cnilep (talk) 23:55, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]