Talk:U.S. Route 321
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| WikiProject U.S. Roads | (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Major Cities info box[edit]
- Shouldn't the order of the U.S. Route 321 Major Cities info box actually follow those on the US321? If this is the case, it seems as some of the South Carolina cities should be placed in order at the top of the box and not intermixed with the North Carolina cities as listed....Bee Cliff River Slob (talk) 06:42, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Split suggestion; Bannered routes of U.S. Route 321[edit]
Suggesting (since November 2012) that the section on bannered routes gets split off into a list of Bannered routes of U.S. Route 321, and replaced with a link in a "See also" section. The current bannered routes section of this article takes up half of it, and there's always potential for expansion of the bannered routes separately. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 14:36, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- I am fine with that idea. --WashuOtaku (talk) 14:53, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- I also support this idea. But we keep the Bannered routes section and just use the section hatnote to link to the main article. –TCN7JM 15:12, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- I think I may have something in mind for the new version of the bannered routes section; Just combine the existing sentences and add the hatnote. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 16:04, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- I also support this idea. But we keep the Bannered routes section and just use the section hatnote to link to the main article. –TCN7JM 15:12, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
My only caveat on supporting is that I don't want a pure copy and paste. These loops should have their sections expanded with it.Mitch32(Victim of public education, 17 years and counting) 15:27, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, I support expansion of these segments 100%. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 15:58, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- UPDATE - Expansion may be a problem. The one source I can find that might help (NCRoads) is a dead link. Evidently it was moved to VA Roads and that link died too. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 15:05, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- You mean this: NCRoads.com Annex. --WashuOtaku (talk) 16:03, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- That was it. When I clicked on the US Route List and Home page from there, it gives me the standard "The webpage cannot be found"/404 message. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 16:54, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- I am not getting any 404 messages, I am able to pull the pages from the link provided; granted some of the images may not load though and the site hasn't been very active since 2004. --WashuOtaku (talk) 18:10, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- That lack of activity since 2004 is a bad sign. I can go to the homepage from the link you provided directly, but if I were to go to the homepage from the US 321 page or some of the others, I'm out of luck. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 18:43, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- Looks to me like NCRoads is a WP:SPS. We don't normally use those as references. We just stick them in the External links. –TCN7JM 21:13, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- It is I guess, but it is mostly an reliable source and provides a lot of history for the highways in the area, which can be backed-up with historic maps on NCDOT website. However, I have been adding "unreliable source" tags when I source the material nowadays. --WashuOtaku (talk) 21:31, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter. It's still an SPS. I was told not to use the North Dakota Highways Page for the same reason, even though it's fairly reliable. Either way, the creator of the site probably got the info from a different, possibly more reliable website. It would be better if you could find an official NCDOT site. –TCN7JM 21:43, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- I can see that the material for expansion is currently not forthcoming. As stated above, we cannot really split until the material is available. In the meantime, I have removed the info boxes just to make things look tidier. By all means re-instate then when more material is available. Op47 (talk) 22:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Here are the routes that have existed:
- BUS US 321 - Winnsboro Mills to Winnsboro, South Carolina
- BUS US 321 - Chester, South Carolina
- BUS US 321 - York, South Carolina
- US 321A - Blowing Rock, North Carolina (former)
- BUS US 321 - Blowing Rock, North Carolina
- BUS US 321 - Dallas to Hickory, North Carolina
- US 321A - Granite Falls to Mount Herman, North Carolina
- BUS US 321 - Lenoir, North Carolina (former) Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 22:57, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Here are the routes that have existed:
- I can see that the material for expansion is currently not forthcoming. As stated above, we cannot really split until the material is available. In the meantime, I have removed the info boxes just to make things look tidier. By all means re-instate then when more material is available. Op47 (talk) 22:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter. It's still an SPS. I was told not to use the North Dakota Highways Page for the same reason, even though it's fairly reliable. Either way, the creator of the site probably got the info from a different, possibly more reliable website. It would be better if you could find an official NCDOT site. –TCN7JM 21:43, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- It is I guess, but it is mostly an reliable source and provides a lot of history for the highways in the area, which can be backed-up with historic maps on NCDOT website. However, I have been adding "unreliable source" tags when I source the material nowadays. --WashuOtaku (talk) 21:31, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- Looks to me like NCRoads is a WP:SPS. We don't normally use those as references. We just stick them in the External links. –TCN7JM 21:13, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- That lack of activity since 2004 is a bad sign. I can go to the homepage from the link you provided directly, but if I were to go to the homepage from the US 321 page or some of the others, I'm out of luck. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 18:43, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- I am not getting any 404 messages, I am able to pull the pages from the link provided; granted some of the images may not load though and the site hasn't been very active since 2004. --WashuOtaku (talk) 18:10, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- That was it. When I clicked on the US Route List and Home page from there, it gives me the standard "The webpage cannot be found"/404 message. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 16:54, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- You mean this: NCRoads.com Annex. --WashuOtaku (talk) 16:03, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- UPDATE - Expansion may be a problem. The one source I can find that might help (NCRoads) is a dead link. Evidently it was moved to VA Roads and that link died too. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 15:05, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- U.S. Route articles needing KML
- Start-Class U.S. Highway system articles
- Mid-importance U.S. Highway system articles
- U.S. Highway system articles
- South Carolina road articles needing KML
- Start-Class South Carolina road transport articles
- Mid-importance South Carolina road transport articles
- South Carolina road transport articles
- North Carolina road articles needing KML
- Start-Class North Carolina road transport articles
- Mid-importance North Carolina road transport articles
- North Carolina road transport articles
- Tennessee road articles needing KML
- Start-Class Tennessee road transport articles
- Mid-importance Tennessee road transport articles
- Tennessee road transport articles
- U.S. Roads project articles without needs-jctint
- Start-Class U.S. road transport articles
- Mid-importance U.S. road transport articles