Talk:Unidirectional network

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

reference to DSTO[edit]

The following introduces the term DSTO without prior/post reference nor link nor definition nor quotation? I could assume what DSTO might refer to, however there are 2 countries that have DSTO in the Wiki disambiguation(and that's assuming even one of those was the one intended by the author)....:

"The US Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) has developed its own unidirectional network called the Network[16] Pump. This is in many ways similar to DSTO's work" DNSLOC (talk) 06:55, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Older talk points[edit]

IMO the article was a bit spammy, therefore I took out the spammy bits. I don't believe that they add anything to the article, but I am open to argument. Springnuts 11:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One of the key things about unidirectional networks is that there's a set of failure modes which result in data loss. It's not possible to 100% guarantee delivery of data. There are solutions which improve availability in the face of data loss. The article doesn't discuss this (but should). 86.128.161.60 (talk) 15:09, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully all that read this article understand that unidirectional networks and the data diode concept does not promote security, as it clearly does not make any provisions for data integrity. Overall, the current revision of this article is much better than previous revisions that were clearly pumped up by the marketing teams of the 1 or 2 vendors that actually manufacture data diodes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.214.215.153 (talk) 23:28, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Unidirectional network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:33, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Linked blog likley SPAM[edit]

The linked blog at the end of the article ( colinrobbins.me/category/data-diode/ ) shows little relevance to the topic and should therefore be considered as SPAM and removed 80.121.81.227 (talk) 09:23, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I thought so too. Done. Thanks. ★NealMcB★ (talk) 17:56, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]