Talk:Unique Identification Authority of India

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject India (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Archive 1

Unique Identification Authority of India[edit]

Protected edit request on 9 June 2014[edit]

Nandan Nilekani is no longer the Chairman of UIDAI. The fact can also be seen on official site. I request that his name be removed from the infobox. NiRinsanity 16:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done--Ymblanter (talk) 19:13, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 12 June 2014[edit]

The following sentence is misleading

"The agency, which has no legal backing,[2] was established in February 2009, and owns and operates the Unique Identification Number database."

The provided source says supreme court has ruled it cannot be mandatory. This does not, in any way, translate to "No legal backing". Firstly, the phrase "no legal backing" is vague in itself and translates to different meaning for different people. Secondly, it deliberately appears to convey something stronger than implied by the supreme court of India. Kniwor (talk) 19:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done I've removed the "no legal backing" part, along with the reference. Please reactivate the request template if you want any more specific changes. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 13:15, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Unethical usage of undo by vested interests[edit]

This page has been edited by many users over last few months and all these were undone by some of the users or possibly few users with different ids. The quality and relevancy of the page is primarily visible from the dates of the references used in the page. Notably all the references are critical about the project. Most of the recent policies of the government and the new reports are not discussed in the article and instead irrelevant issues like land allocations were discussed. On adding more recent and relevant information, those vested interests will simply undo that without even attempting to edit and make the page more relevant. This is highly condemnable about a widely discussed topic in Indian media. Please abstain from doing this. Instead of undoing this, please edit it to make it better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marlisco (talkcontribs) 10:43, 27 July 2014 (UTC)