This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
Surhone, L. M., Tennoe, M. T., & Henssonow, S. F., United Nations Stabilisation Mission in Haiti: United Nations, 2010 Haiti earthquake, 2010 Haitian cholera outbreak, 2004 Haitian coup d'état, 2004 Haitian rebellion, Betascript Publishing
The map currently used in the infobox marks a number of territories of the members as sovereign member states - such as Hong Kong an Macao. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 17:35, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Why is the name in the lede translated into French but not the other UN languages? Gob Lofa (talk) 03:12, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
I would guess there are too many "UN languages" to translate to all of them. It's not really necessary as there are links on the left margin to the other-language articles about the UN. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:35, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
There's six offical UN languages. I don't see why French would trump any of the other four in an English language article. Gob Lofa (talk) 02:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
French is a lingua franca across a lot of Europe as well as parts of North America, Africa, and Asia. It's not too unusual to see. I'd recommend removing the French translation rather than add the other four, if it really bothers you. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Someone got there ahead of me. Bon. Gob Lofa (talk) 16:40, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
This is a 404 Not Found link. Does anyone know if it's moved, or just no longer exists? I'm reluctant to mark it as a dead link until we have more data (we might simply just have to change the URL). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:3:8082:9670:2C65:7632:2F3E:E048 (talk) 16:35, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Done The UN split the single page into a series of pages. I added an archive URL, although not from as late as the accessdate. The citation will have to be re-done the next time this comes up for assessment. Thanks for letting us know about this issue. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:33, 15 January 2015 (UTC)