|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
|
|
 Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (marked as Low-importance). |
|
|
| WikiProject U.S. Government To-do: |
|
Here are some tasks you can do:
- Article requests: Bring Federal government of the United States to GA. Rescue 99 Percent Declaration from deletion.
- Cleanup: Federal government of the United States#Executive branch
- Copyedit:
Office of Surface Mining, Federal depository library
- Expand: Office of Surface Mining, General Land Office
- Stubs: Bureau of Engraving and Printing
- Update: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, United States House of Representatives elections in California, 2008; United States House of Representatives elections in Idaho, 2006, United States House of Representatives elections in Nevada, 2006; United States mayoral elections, 2007
- Verify: Bureau of Reclamation, United States Grazing Service, General Land Office, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Engraving and Printing
- Other: List of U.S. states by GDP per capita (nominal) is self contradictory
|
|
|
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
| Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. |
|
| Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
| Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
| |
|
|
|
|
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. |
|
|
|
|
[edit] Garbled table
Page setup is garbled after table of former. I correct this by replacing
{{end U.S. judgeship Former}}
with the standard pipe-syntax table-end marker |}, which I admit is quick but dirty. Someone more knowledgeable than I on the {{start / {{end syntax may want to change this to avoid mixed syntax. Stefan Ivanovich 11:26, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what's going on. While {{end U.S. judgeship Former}} did redirect to {{end box}} and a certain user did move the {{end box}} template, that should not have affected the {{end U.S. judgeship Former}} template. I'm wondering if somebody attempted to upgrade the underlying MediaWiki software and broke something. In any case, I've got the {{end U.S. judgeship Former}} template working.
- Also, I wrote the edit summary before I saw that you had posted on the discussion page. I think my edit summary was too harsh, particularly for someone who went to the trouble of posting on the talk page, so I apologize for that.
- — DLJessup (talk) 13:22, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
The heading is now inaccurate. It says that this is the court as of the elevation of Alito to the Supreme Court. Judge Rosenn has since died, and his death has now been reflected in the table. So it's no longer a table of the court as of Alito's elevation but as of Rosenn's death. That should be changed, but I'm not sure exactly what it should say. Should the Alito reference stay in there? I imagine part of the purpose of that was to make it clear that this takes his elevation into account, and maybe there's still reason for mentioning that, but I wouldn't know how to say it to make it accurate about reflecting Judge Rosenn's death. — Parableman (talk) 17:14, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Future Vacancy Coming
Judge Roth will take Senior Status on May 31, 2006. The info is here: [1]. Let's remember to update then.--Smashingworth 20:36, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Table standardization
Please note and contribute to this discussion. Billyboy01 (talk) 23:05, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
