There is an error in the image in the "Sample uuencode" section. The "Binary representation" for the letter "a" shows nine binary digits rather than eight. The first zero should not be there. Ivar Y 16:40, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
This utility is found in the GNU Sharutils package http://www.gnu.org/software/sharutils/sharutils.html
GNU uuencode 1.0 distribution has been merged into GNU shar utilities 4.1 distribution.
This is not a complete or precise description of uuencode
This is not a complete or precise description of uuencode, it requires simplification and clarification as well as extending
It misses the explanation of line start character being the pre-coded line length e.g. 'M' for a 45 byte input length
It misses the addition of '=' characters to pad the output if the input is not a multiple of 24 bits, so '\x00\x00' codes to "AAA="
Trivia section may have an error
The link to COMT in the trivia section is probably incorrect. In this context COMT is not likely to be an enzyme or gene.
- Problem solved. There was no reason for that to be in the article anyway, so now it's toast. RossPatterson 23:22, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
The citation for the "begin<SPACE><SPACE>"-Bug is this: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/898124 There really was a time when some Linux-geeks annoyed Outlook Express users in some newsgroups (like dasr (Sysadmin recovery)) by including a "begin quote from ..". This does not occur with Mime-messages
The trivia section states that the bloat is 33%. However, a typical line of UUEcoding begins with an "M" (ASCII code 45, indicating 45 bytes encoded on this line) followed by 60 characters and ending with CR/LF - ie 63 characters to encode 45 data bytes. 63/45 is 1.4, or 40% bloat, not 33%. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 00:38, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
ASCII characters greater than 95?
Exaggerated statement "ASCII characters greater than 95 may also be used; however, only the six least-significant bits are relevant." needs citation! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 07:22, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Grave accent in trailer
Implementations of uuencoding that I've seen do not seem to have a grave accent on the next-to-last line, they use a space character (0x20) instead. This is the case in GNU sharutils (see http://linux.die.net/man/5/uuencode) as well as at least an other utility I've run into (libdes, which implements its own uuencode/decode routines). Is this a variant of the format, or is the grave accent currently shown in the article wrong? Mlindstr (talk) 19:57, 9 May 2013 (UTC)