Talk:Vígríðr

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Vígríðr has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
January 25, 2010 Good article nominee Listed
WikiProject Norse history and culture (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norse history and culture, a WikiProject related to all activities of the North Germanic peoples, both in Scandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of the Kalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

The Norwegian racist group Vigrid[edit]

Vigrid is also the name of an racistic nationalistic organization in Norway —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paragon.NORG.06 (talkcontribs) 16:50, August 9, 2006 (UTC)

why delete my article about Vigrid (org) ?[edit]

my article about the Norwegian neo-nazi organisation Vigrid was deleted. This is the most famous right wing exstrimistic group in Norway —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mirmax77 (talkcontribs) 19:26, October 6, 2006 (UTC)

I was actually looking for that when I searched. There SHOULD be an article about them, not merged into this one though. Please someone, write an article. There needs to be an article about them here, especially now that they're running for election. --Theatheama (talk) 10:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

agreed[edit]

the article about the neo-nazi norwegian organization Vigrid should be put back —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.88.108.115 (talk) 20:33, January 7, 2007 (UTC)

Marginal and irrelevant to this article. Martin Manne 20:20, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Created article[edit]

I have now created an article about the Norwegian organization Vigrid in its own page. (I mostly created it as I have created articles about almost all political parties that are running for the 2009 parliamentary election in Norway, which Vigrid actually is in for the first time.) -GabaG (talk) 00:22, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Vígríðr/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: maclean (talk) 05:37, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article?)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
  5. It is stable.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    2 images, both WPCommons-hosted public domain images.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Notes
  • In Poetic Edda, one block quote have quotation mark and the other doesn't. According to MOS:QUOTE the block quotes shouldn't have marks. Is there a reason for one having q marks and other not? of can we remove them?
  • Has there been any academic analysis or ruminations on this location? or comparisons to other religious battlefields?
  1. The reason for the quotation marks there is because Bellows's translation includes them, and therefore I have.
  2. As I recall, when I wrote this article I couldn't find much talk about the field at all. Surely there's some discussion about the location out there somewhere, but it wasn't in the usual places when I was looking. I would have liked to included a "theories" section with such information. :bloodofox: (talk) 03:09, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
OK. maclean (talk) 00:49, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Is this correct that Surt dies at ragnarok?[edit]

"Surtr will spray fire over the earth and burn the entire world before dying of the wounds given to him by Frey." I can't find anything else saying that. The reference is just "Faulkes (1995:54).", completely uncheckable. Are you ready for IPv6? (talk) 11:40, 27 April 2014 (UTC)