Talk:Victorian Railways S class

Australia: Victoria / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Victorian Railways S class is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains: Locomotives Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	October 15, 2006

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Victorian Railways S class/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Wow, on first glance, this one looks GA-worthy. This article should definitely work up through the chain. Slambo (Speak) 16:10, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback! What are your thoughts on what would improve this article to get it to GA quality? Zzrbiker 23:54, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 23:54, 15 October 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 09:57, 30 April 2016 (UTC)