Literature High‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Children's literature Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

European history Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discussion[edit]

Misspellings[edit]

There were mispellings in Supernatural and Fantastic Literature, so I changed them to correct spellings, with the exception of a few that I didn't know how to spell correctly.- A guest

References[edit]

This is a nice article, but it is almost completely unreferenced. Can anyone add references? -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:34, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am working on complying some sources. The Handbook to Gothic Literature, edited by Marie Mulvey-Roberts looks like it will be helpful for the Supernatural and Fantastic Literature section. AJScribe (talk) 14:31, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bad first sentence[edit]

"Victorian literature is the literature produced...." - maybe someone can change the first few sentences to sound better? 71.187.218.204 (talk) 00:38, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Poetry and Drama[edit]

For anyone looking for a project, this section is very messy. The tone is somewhat moralistic, and not impersonal at all. 128.239.155.247 (talk) 02:22, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scholars prefer Christina Rossetti to D. G. Rossetti. Not all scholars. Which scholars? Why? Such bold statements about who is better or worse are irritating. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.91.237.215 (talk) 20:38, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additions[edit]

I propose adding Charles Kingsley, R.M. Ballantyne, Walter Savage Landor, and although he is only an early Victorian Capt. Marryat as well as Sir Henry Newbolt to the list of authors. Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 00:25, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The style of the Victorian novel[edit]

Shouldn't this section be deleted? Any discussion of style can be included in the previous section. Rwood128 (talk) 16:11, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Focus of this article[edit]

What is the focus of this article? It currently has no introduction to define its subject. Is it British literature during the reign of Victoria? Does it include literature set in Britain during the period (which would explain Jules Verne)? If French literature is thus to be included, presumably British languages other than English should be covered as well. The article seems to wander far afield without ever arriving at any coherence. Thoughts, anybody? Man vyi (talk) 07:54, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dickens' Last Novel[edit]

Dickens' last novel was The Mystery of Edwin Drood, which was only half finished when he died in 1870. Perhaps Our Mutual Friend should be described as Dickens' "last complete novel". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.211.131.240 (talk) 22:40, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Partisan statement[edit]

"In the later decades of the Victorian era Thomas Hardy was the most important novelist."

Important according to who ? You can't just state things like that on wikipedia can you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.4.251.236 (talk) 11:56, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nonfiction[edit]

The article in general isn't great, but I think the discussion of non-fiction, in particular, is bad. We mention precisely five writers: Darwin, Mill, Carlyle, Engels (who wrote primarily in German), and Morris (not actually a non-fiction writer). Other than Darwin, these don't even warrant a full sentence, though Mill and Carlyle are of course very very important Victorian era writers. Not mentioned at all: Macaulay, Huxley, Newman, Ruskin (who does get a bare listing as an "other Victorian writer"), and Spencer, just to mention the most obvious omissions, as these are all towering figures of the Victorian era. john k (talk) 13:17, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New book[edit]

Serials to Graphic Novels: The Evolution of the Victorian Illustrated Book, by Catherine J. Golden, 2017, University Press of Florida Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 01:47, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Victorian literature. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:59, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image[edit]

It was not very clear why the image at the top, File:Ford Madox Brown - Work - Google Art Project.jpg, was related to Victorian literature. It seems that the painting was taken from A Companion to Victorian Literature and Culture, but I don't understand why this painting should be included in this article. I changed the top image from Ford Madox Brown's painting to Middlemarch's frontispice. --saebou (talk) 00:42, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Changed first paragraph and added a reference section[edit]

Introductory paragraph had several unsubstantiated statements with no references. I altered it to instead convey the encompassing idea of victorian literature. I also added a reference section. This is my first wikipedia edit. Please provide feedback. Ty

The Golden Age of English Literature?[edit]

The claim that Victorian literature is widely considered the golden age of English literature is unsubstantiated. The source, which is poorly written, poorly researched, and without sources of its own, offers no evidence on behalf of this claim.

Blatant source dishonesty in this article[edit]

This article presents unconfirmed and uncorroborated information as if it were fact, especially in the “Influence of Victorian literature” section. Sources are cited, but further investigation of those sources reveals nothing at all that confirms or corroborates the claims in the Wikipedia article (e.g., see the sixth [6] source citation). SAPERE AUDE AD INFINITUM 03:24, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Regarding the 6th source citation supporting the statement that "Hardy used his novels to question religion and social structures." From the source citation: "Tess and Jude received many criticisms upon publication, for in examinations of the fallen woman, sin, the class system, and the vagaries of religion and marriage,--".... I thought it was adequate? Spacecat711 (talk) 16:43, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Spacecat711[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Disrupting the Status Quo- Social Justice in Technical and Professional Com[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2022 and 2 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AJScribe (article contribs).