Talk:Von Mises–Fisher distribution

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Statistics (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page or join the discussion.

Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
 
WikiProject Mathematics (Rated Start-class, Low-priority)
WikiProject Mathematics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Mathematics rating:
Start Class
Low Priority
 Field: Probability and statistics

Presumably it generalizes to a Mises distribution (circle) for p=3, not p=2, since circles are 2-dimensional and the von Mises-Fisher distribution is p-1 dimensional. There might be something I missed though, so I'm not going to change it without confirmation. --Smári McCarthy 13:16, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

The circle is not 2-dimensional, but 1-dimensional, as any point on the circle can be uniquely identified by a singe angle. Similarly, the sphere is 2-dimensional, as each point can be identified by a pair of polar angles. However, you do need an extra dimension to 'represent' the circle or sphere without distortions. --TomixDf Mon Aug 7 12:02:13 2006

Someone please clarify which von Mises[edit]

Was it Ludwig von Mises, the Austrian economist? The article doesn't say, nor does the article on the von Mises distribution. I was surprised recently to find out that LvM had in fact done early work on algorithmic randomness. --Trovatore (talk) 01:17, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

It was his brother, Richard von Mises. Tomixdf (talk) 09:04, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Mardia reference missing[edit]

What is the Mardia (2000) reference? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.243.253.117 (talk) 13:03, 13 June 2011 (UTC)