Talk:Walking Purchase

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lehigh Valley Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lehigh Valley, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Lehigh Valley region of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lehigh ValleyWikipedia:WikiProject Lehigh ValleyTemplate:WikiProject Lehigh ValleyLehigh Valley articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Where?[edit]

Wrightstown near the Lehigh?

It's hard to known what the author meant hear by "the junction of the Delaware River and Lehigh River (near present Wrightstown, Pennsylvania)".

It is commonly held that this continuation of the walking purchase was began near Wrightstown. Indeed, there is an historic marker on PA 413 commemorating the site.

On the other hand, if one were at the confluence of the Leigh and Delaware rivers, you would be in Easton. This is a good 40 miles from Wrightstown.

BTW: How about some references?

Please, clear this up. --Wbfairer2 01:28, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrightstown,Bucks County[edit]

Wrightstown is in Bucks County and close to the Delaware River. The Delaware and Leigh Canal (built in 1800s) runs from Easton and Bristol and connect to Leigh River. There is a marker for the Walking Purchase off of State Rt. 413 in Wrightstown Township,Bucks County. The article is not clear and sound like rivers meeting in that area and they do not. --Bill Wilson, Quaker,former Bucks Countian and journalist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wmhwilson (talk • contribs) 02:22, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why the confusion?

Here's what Anderson and Cayton say in their 2005 The Dominion of War, sourced from "The scandalous Indian Policy of William Penn's Sons: Deeds and Documents of the Walking Purchase," Pennsylvania History 37 (1970):

"Thomas Penn and James Logan produced what they maintained was a copy of an "ancient deed," dating from 1686, by whichthe Delawares had ceded lands ostensibly at the Forks of the Delaware- the confluence of the Lehigh and Delaware rivers- tp the extent that a man could walk in a day and a half. The time had come they said to carry out this walk. The ancient deed was in fact a copy of a document recording a transaction that had long ago taken place further to the south, but the description was vague enough that Logan could maintain that it pertained to the land between the Neshaminy Creek and the Delaware River: that is the territory that Nutimus (the most defiant of the Delaware kings) had refused to sell."

The "Walk" started on 10/19/1737 and ended the next day. The purchase was finally signed in Easton, PA, 5 years later in 1742, on behalf of the Delaware/Lenni Lenape by the Iroquois who had also helped stage this now embarrassing stunt.

Would the writer please adjust the extraneous links to Wrightstown?

TheChindiThechindi (talk) 22:31, 19 May 2010 (UTC)John Whipple, Easton, PA.[reply]

Was Voltaire wrong about William Penn's 1683 treaty with the Lenape Indians?[edit]

There is a discussion here about William Penn's 1683 treaty with the Lenape Indians, and specifically whether Voltaire's famous quote ("...a treaty never written, never broken") from his 1764 Dictionnaire philosophique was incorrect. Could someone please take a look at it? Thanks! --Guy Macon (talk) 16:52, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Walking Purchase. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120727035124/http://culture.delawaretribe.org/walkingpurchase.htm to http://culture.delawaretribe.org/walkingpurchase.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:24, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]