Talk:Wanted (2009 film)

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in July 2012.

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

Untitled[edit]

What is this, an advert for the Film? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.209.181.185 (talk) 19:44, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since an editor just asked for a reasoning for the tags I placed on the article, I came here to give one, but I see the issue has been around since October 2009. The synopsis is written like an advertisement by the film-makers; in fact, it's almost hard to believe it hasn't been copy-pasted from a movie review site. I'm restoring the tags now, since the issues are pretty blatant. KaySL (talk) 16:00, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I do agree that the tone of the synopsis maybe a bit inappropriate, but how does this come under advertisement. References are provided for all box office figures and other things and I am sure nothing is a copy paste here. I don't understand how is this an advert? And what's this "in-universe" tag for? You didn't explain about it. Managerarc^[Talk] 16:21, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It comes under advertisement because the synopsis sounds like something right off a promotional site or article, like what you'd expect from your average official movie site. Though perhaps the advertisement aspect is borderline, the tone is definitely way off and needs changing, therefore I've tagged it as such. As for the in-universe aspect, again the synopsis is written with a complete lack of context and lacks a real-world frame of reference. I think once the tone is dealt with, the other issues will fall away at the same time. KaySL (talk) 16:29, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As the plot have been re-written, I don't find any problem with the tone now. Managerarc^[Talk] 11:49, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it looks a fair bit better now, so I've removed the problem templates. Nice job. KaySL^talk 15:25, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged for advert[edit]

I've tagged this as 'written like an advert' as the plot section is quite biased (e.g. "... is a hardcore gangster who will do anything for money"), but I haven't seen the film, so wouldn't be able to summarise it. — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 01:14, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Wanted (2009 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:33, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]