Talk:Waterloo tube station

	London transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations / in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

Two stations?[edit]

In what sense does Waterloo consist of two tube stations? The article on Bank and Monument says that those "stations" officially form one station, which includes the Waterloo & City Line. Given that the Waterloo & City Line is now operated as a part of the London Underground, I cannot imagine why Waterloo tube station would be considered as two stations. A reference would be needed to support that statement if it is true. Mtford 01:49, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to).. Adding a {{fact}} template isn't fixing it. --kingboyk 18:42, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why a separate article?[edit]

Having looked at Liverpool Street station, I cannot see why Waterloo tube station is a separate article from Waterloo mainline station. Has a merge been proposed and rejected previously? If not, perhaps it is worth considering. --TBM10 (talk) 10:29, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's not the only one that's separate. In addition to Waterloo, there are also: Charing Cross tube station; Euston tube station; and King's Cross St. Pancras tube station. In the case of Blackfriars tube station; Cannon Street tube station; Liverpool Street tube station; Marylebone tube station; Moorgate tube station; Paddington tube station; and Victoria tube station, there's one shared article. Score 4-7 in favour of shared - but I think that if more than one article is to be either split or merged, a general discussion should be held, with both WT:LT and WT:UKRAIL being informed. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:26, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite and additions[edit]

I thought it was a bit embarrassing that Waterloo - one of the busiest stations on the underground - has such a short article when compared to the Kings Cross St Pancras/Euston tube station articles. Suggestions/Edits/Criticism very much welcome :) Turini2 (talk) 00:30, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]