Talk:WaveLab

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Professional sound production Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WaveLab is also a collection of Matlab code implementing a bunch of wavelet stuff, released by Stanford. It might be nice to have a page about that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Singularitarian (talk • contribs) 18:10, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

-- Seconded. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.167.251.186 (talk) 22:06, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just removed the advertising and NPOV taqs. They were added by an anonymous user who has tagged many articles in that way in short period of time, and I can't see any way in which this article is advertising, just statement of fact. BTW no connection with this product. Just came across the tags while looking at the list of edits the anonymous user had done. Robert Walker (talk) 11:16, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]